I remember when I was a kid in schools in California they were speaking about Esperanto like it was some sort of good thing, but the public not being smart enough to catch on.

Meanwhile, the world has been learning Business English AKA, Star Fleet Standard.

I have been studying Soros for a bit over the last six months and I am coming to some slightly different conclusions, but the answers are mostly in Wikipedia and Youtube, if you read what's really there.

I actually am pretty sure I have this one figured out. Interesting how the guy who gave me the keys to figuring it all out is someone we are not hearing much from any more, but I guess that goes to the back room whisper campaign of lies against me.

Fact of the matter is the key lies in what the Diaxaris project was supposed to be: Strategic disengagement while the real parties in the big conflict sort out and reveal who they really are.

This whole thing about the "anti-Soros" campaign is really that Hegelian Dialectic. By controlling a problem and opposition, the Soros camp controls a narrative, and that narrative has a predetermined conclusion and solution which goes with his handoff of power when he passes on.

It's how the rites of succession work in their world of power, a form of regicide which makes it where the new regime has no obligation of loyalty to the rules of the old regime. Real old world stuff.

I caught it in a big budge film recently, its the sort of thing to subconsciously set the theme for the exchange of power on this and I have it pretty well figured out who the next big leader guy is going to be.