Obama Officials Heading to Mexico to Discuss International Gun Control Via UN Treaty

by AWR Hawkins23 Aug 2015

On August 24 officials from the Obama administration will be attending the UN Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) conference in Mexico City.

The ATT was signed by Secretary of State John Kerry on September 25, 2013 but never ratified by the US Senate. Nevertheless, Gun Owners of America reports that Obama officials will be in Mexico City for the conference.

Breitbart News previously reported that the ATT is an international gun control treaty designed to be implemented apart from, or in spite of, the general framework of governance for countries that are signatories to it.

Thus, while it will not do away with the Second Amendment on paper, it will subjugate the Second Amendment to the ATT’s gun controls if Obama administration officials return and implement the plans they will discuss in Mexico City.

ATT was pushed under the guise of stopping “small arms [and] light weapons” from crossing borders. And when it was being discussed in 2013, Breitbart News warned that firearm registration must proceed from the ATT if it is to be enforceable. After all, how can agents tasked with enforcing this treaty ascertain the origin of smuggled weapons without a comprehensive registration on file?

Moreover, the NRA pointed out that the treaty all but calls for a registry from the start inasmuch as it requires “importing countries to provide information to an exporting country regarding arms transfers, including ‘end use or end user documentation’ for a ‘minimum of ten years.’” This information on “end users” is not only a de-facto international gun registry but one that could be “made available to foreign governments.”

Because of all these troubling aspects of ATT, Gun Owners of America (GOA) warns that the Mexico City conference is part of a plan “to bring back the framework for a global gun control regime.” GOA encourages every gun owner to call his or her US Senator and ask that they stand strong against any international gun control recommendations or regulations that the Obama administration pushes after the August 24 ATT conference.

We must be diligent, especially because Democrat Senators have already shown their willingness to subjugate the Second Amendment to the ATT. Forty-four Democrat Senators voted for the ATT in April 2013.

Follow AWR Hawkins on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.

Of all the evil un-constitution crap this treasonous tyrant has pulled..... THIS has to be the worst.

The answer is very simple.

Stop with the rhetoric and the Calling your Senator Bull Shit and start growing some Real Balls and get ready to fight and I don't mean with only words.

First thing we need to do is tell the bastards that if they try to implement that Unconstitutional Treaty it means Civil War and we must get across to the Enemy that we are serious.

We need to Organize very large Armed Demonstrations in every State Capital and in as many Large, Medium and Small Cities as possible and we must be willing to go all the way if the Enemy attempt to use force to stop the Demonstrations.

I know how to set up these Demonstrations for the most effect and if anyone is interested in actually doing something other then Posting on Forums or engaging in useless talk I will educate you on how to do it.

The way I look at it, why do we own firearms if we refuse to use them what is the truth is it that we are nothing but stinking Cowards.

It is said that talk is cheep and that is just the truth.

Thanks to Congress the UN Plot to Confiscate American Guns Took a Giant Step Forward

25 Aug, 2015 by Dave Hodges

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2...american-guns-took-a-giant-step-forward/

Trapped within the fanfare Chinese Black Monday and the American stock market plunging almost 600 points yesterday, suspicious explosions in China and on an American military base, there has been a very important, but quiet development ,which is escaping the attention of both the American people and the Independent Media.

The Corker Bill Spells the End of the Second Amendment

We are safe from the ravages of the UN Small Arms Treaty, aren’t we? In fact, many Senators have openly stated that they refuse to ratify this controversial treaty. Well, that is not exactly true. There is a new process established by the new Corker bill may very well have changed the way treaties are passed from here on out.

Under our Constitution, a full two thirds vote from senators for ratification to approve any kind of a treaty. This provision of the Constitution is very clear on this point and it is designed to prevent a treasonous subversion of the Constitution. However when one is living under a criminal enterprise, such as the one presented by the present criminal enterprise in power, who worries about following the rules? As a case in point, under the Corker bill, in order to have stopped the Iran nuclear deal, a two thirds vote to stop it from being implemented by the White House. This is not what the Constitution says and this out and out treason against the people of the United States as the Corker bill is a back door to taking our guns while nullifying the second Amendment.

Under the Corker bill, the following paragraphs describe what we are in for.

The Plot to Disarm America Is Commencing

The evidence is mounting that Obama and his colleagues at the United Nations are preparing for complete gun confiscation of civilian owned American guns. There is a new document, previously held secret, which has surfaced and clearly signals the intention of the United Nations to engage in gun confiscation in the relatively near future. The document is damning, however, the existence of the document is not even needed to prove the point that there is a major confrontation brewing between the American people and an international peace-keeping UN force, and it’s coming right around the corner.
Another Nail In America’s Coffin

The following is a smoking gun document that presents seven sequential steps designed to culminate in the total disarmament of the American nation. For those of you that know your history, you will note that there were 17 genocides in the 20th Century and in each case, these genocides were preceded by gun confiscation by the host government. According to the Democide Project located at the University of Hawaii, governments killed far more people, an estimated 26o million victims, than even war. History shows that if we ever allow government, the UN, or the U.S., to ever be able to seize our guns, we are signing our death warrant!

The following document is a declaration of war against the United States people. For those who find the document to be on the blurry side, scroll down to the Appendix to view a clearer copy.


The UN and its cohorts have accomplished steps 1-5 (see below). They are now working on steps 6 and 7 which would constitute complete disarmament of the American people.

The UN and its cohorts have accomplished steps 1-5 (see below). They are now working on steps 6 and 7 which would constitute complete disarmament of the American people.

If one examines the first five steps of the plot, it is easy to ascertain the pattern of gun confiscation that Obama has attempted to follow. I do not believe that Obama has to completely implement steps 1-5 before moving to enforce steps 6 and 7. Therefore, even though Obama has not completely implemented the first five steps across the country, he has done enough to usher in Steps 6 and 7 in this United Nations disarmament plan. Steps 6 and 7 are listed below:

“6. Finally, codification of laws to completely makes any and all firearms illegal to own, possess or use outside of military and law enforcement usage.


7. Creation of a United Nations Police Taskforce with the specific mission of assisting member nations with the collection of weaponry from civilian hands”.

The proof for the validity of the intentions signaled by this document does not lie in the authenticity of any single document. The smoking gun evidence that Obama is progressively moving towards seizing all 300,000,000 civilian guns in this country, lies in the ubiquitous manner in which Obama has pursued sequential and progressive steps toward the disarming of the American people. As it has been said, “Judge a man by what he does, not by what he says”. The cases in point would be what Obama has tried to accomplish after the Boston Marathon Bombing, the Batman Aurora, CO. shootings and the Sandy Hook event. With some very sloppy bootstrapping steps following these events, Obama has progressively attempted to make guns more difficult to obtain and he has greatly expanded what is defined as “military grade weapons” and to limit what is considered to be “appropriate” for hunting as he has tried to block Americans from obtaining as many of these weapons as possible.

“1. Classification of military grade weapons to be made illegal for possession”.

“4. Codification of laws to begin the restricting and strict licensing of hunting grade firearms.”

I am certain that most people familiar with present Second Amendment debates will recognize the various and omnipresent “gun buy-back” programs funded with your tax money designed to remove guns from civilian hands.

“2. Creation of programs to provide reasonable compensation for voluntary surrender of said arms”.

How many times have we witnessed Obama standing before the cameras and national press corps and threaten to take unilateral action against our gun rights following each one of the false flag events mentioned above? In each instance, Obama has used thinly veiled excuses that he only wants to take away guns that “military grade weapons”.

“1. Classification of military grade weapons to be made illegal for possession.

5. Codification of laws to restrict the sale of, and possession of ammunition and components to manufacture ammunition”.

Connecting the Dots for Gun Confiscation

Even if the the UN document designed to disarm America, listed above, was not genuine (and it is), the following, very public document has been proven to be very authentic.

Under the heading, “Hiding in plain sight”, the United Nations has been advertising for the following position for over a year:

Posting Title: Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration Officer, P4

Job Title Code: DISARMAMENT, DEMOBILIZATION AND REINTEGRATION OFFICER

Department/Office: Department of Peacekeeping Operations

Duty Station: New York

Job Description: A minimum of seven years of progressively responsible experience in disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration or related area. Experience working within peacekeeping, peace-building or development programmes operations is desirable. Experience with small arms control, conflict/post-conflict crisis management, economic recovery is desirable. Experience coordinating multiple partner agencies, funds or programmes is desirable.

There is even more fuel to throw on this raging fire as we consider the fact that, at the behest of President Obama, Secretary of State John Kerry illegally, and in direct violation to the Constitution of the United States, signed the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The UN Arms Trade Treaty contains all 7 provisions listed above in the Disarmament Commission of the United Nations.

un gun control

We should also be focusing on the military invasion that is about to unfold in this country. This will be the military invasion that will be UN sponsored and it will be the one that seizes our guns. Take a look at the following images of UN military vehicles spotted and photographed in our country in the past 14 months.

Conclusion

Thanks to Congress, Obama has found a backdoor way around the Second Amendment by subverting our treaty process. The stealth in which this is occurring is mind-boggling. I hope that many of the readers will share this information with friends and neighbors. Americans cannot comply with the treason that will arise out of this act.

What I stated in my first post is and still is completely 100% VALID.

If American Gun Owners permit this to happen it is Positive Proof beyond any doubt that the American Gun Owners do not deserve to own Guns and People deserve the FATE that awaits them.

Personally I consider this article to be a pile of STINKING BULL SHIT since it neglects to even mention how the 100 Million Gun Owners will or may respond.

The First American Revolution was triggered by attempted Gun Confiscation and if Obama and the others who want to confiscate our Guns have forgotten the lessons of History and try once more to confiscate our Weapons they will Trigger the next American Revolution.

The Difference hopefully will be that we will remember History and not make the same mistake of the First one and this time All of our Enemies need to be exterminated and none will be left to again attempt the destruction of our Great Republic at some point in the Future.

Liberalism is a disease and it needs to be eradicated as the plague it is.

If modern Patriots have a failing it is their goodness and their lack of balls big enough to do what is needed to win this War and prevent the Enemy from regrouping and trying again at a future time and maybe next time it will not take over 100 Years for it to happen.

The White House is lying about "gun violence" again. Gun violence is not "becoming" anything, except scarcer.

Except for the police, of course.

Onward and upward,
airforce

Secretary of State John Kerry Signs United Nations Gun Ban Treaty Against Wishes of U.S. Senate

26 Aug, 2015 by Warner Todd Huston


If U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry has his way the United Nations will be able to say if Americans are allowed to have their Second Amendment rights. He has just signed an anti-gun treaty with the United Nations that the U.S. Senate has already said it is against.

The treaty Kerry signed without authorization from the Senate would create an un-Constitutional registry of all US gun buyers and would lead to the UN controlling American’s gun rights.

Secretary of State John Kerry on Wednesday signed a controversial U.N. treaty on arms regulation, riling U.S. lawmakers who vow the Senate will not ratify the agreement.

As he signed the document, Kerry called the treaty a “significant step” in addressing illegal gun sales, while claiming it would also protect gun rights.

“This is about keeping weapons out of the hands of terrorists and rogue actors. This is about reducing the risk of international transfers of conventional arms that will be used to carry out the world’s worst crimes. This is about keeping Americans safe and keeping America strong,” he said. “This treaty will not diminish anyone’s freedom. In fact, the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess, and use arms for legitimate purposes.”

U.S. lawmakers, though, have long claimed the treaty could lead to new gun control measures. They note the U.S. Senate has final say on whether to approve the agreement.

Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., in a letter to President Obama, urged his administration not to take any action to implement the treaty without the consent of the Senate.

He claimed the treaty raises “fundamental issues” concerning “individual rights protected by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.”

The National Rifle Association blasted the plan, claiming it would impose an “invasive registration scheme” by requiring importing countries to give exporting countries information on “end users.”

“The Obama administration is once again demonstrating its contempt for our fundamental, individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms,” Chris Cox, executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action, said in a statement. “These are blatant attacks on the constitutional rights and liberties of every law-abiding American. The NRA will continue to fight this assault on our fundamental freedom.”

Once again Obama’s regime tries to end the Second Amendment by stealth.

This IMHO would be the last straw that would break the camel's back.

There have always been opponents to the US Constitution, both in and out of government jobs. But, what has made a difference is that they have been allowed to come out of the closet.

Timidly at first, as roaches with a nite light. But, once they saw that they would be fed and encouraged to multiply by the government itself, they flourish.

Now, we are overrun with diseased, unthinking roaches. Huskerpatriot says, "This IMHO would be the last straw that would break the camel's back."

As an observer to the anti-freedom and anti-God-given rights people, I have seen many, many 'lines drawn in the sand.' Had patriots acted decisively 14 years ago, we would not be where we are right now. But, people keep re-drawing their lines in the sand. Now, there is no more sand. Only an ocean of tyranny just inches away from drowning the few remaining patriots.

Do the folks who are elected "to represent us" (that's a chilling joke) know that this administration has MANY TIMES violated the Constitution. Of course. But, can they do anything about it ?

Look at all the "Committee Hearings" (made-for-media entertainment) the Republicans have held for corrupt government employees under Obama. Who has been jailed for contempt ? Who has been punished for any wrongdoing ? Where is the backbone of men and women who have supposedly been elected to uphold the Constitution ? They have been neutered and found totally incapable and unwilling to change a thing.

The UN Treaty which Obama signed is merely one example of the many times he has spit into the face of God-given rights and the American people....and gotten away with it. Latest analysis shows that even if Congress and the Senate decide to reject his agreement with the UN, there are not enough votes to override his veto.

So, the broken backs of many camels has brought about only this--a stupidly counter-productive program called ObamaCare.

From what I have read on this Board the Law has changed and now in order to stop this Treaty, Congress has to have enough Votes to Override an Obama Veto, Not Good, Not Good At All. but all is not lost, at least not yet.

Congress can still stop this using it's Power over the Budget and Shutting down the Government if that is what it takes.

And even if that does not work there is still We The People and there is a lot that we can do.

First we Demonstrate with Armed Demonstrations, and then if it is necessary we go to WAR and it needs to be a Total War and we must do everything we need to do and we Must Not Have Mercy on our Enemy.

Yes I said TOTAL WAR and that is what will be needed. We also need to change our attitudes and beliefs on certain things, such as Terrorism.

Now since I mentioned Terrorism I need to give a little explanation.

What am am thinking about is Action taken by Americans not in the United States but in the Countries that have sent Troops to Kill Americans in the United States, meaning UN Blue Helmets.

Isis is not only killing in the land they control but they are killing people in lets say France who have insulted the Prophet, they have taken their War to the Enemy, and that is what American Patriots need to consider and if needed to do.

There are a lot of Americans who live in Foreign Countries and once the UN sends Blue Helmets to kill Americans then American Patriots who are living in Countries e.g. France which have sent Troops to the United States need to take Physical Action within those Countries against Civilian Targets to make that Country and it's Citizens / Subjects feel the pain that American Civilians are feeling due to the Actions of their their Troops, to bring the Horror of War to them.

Let the French Civilians understand and experience the Horror that the French Government and French Troops are doing to Americans.

I have a lot to say about the Subject of Fighting a Civil War or Revolution but most of that I will save for a latter post or for another Topic.

First let me say this, it is not necessary for large groups of Patriots to take Action all that is needed is for a FEW Real Patriots to take Individual Action to totally F*uck up the Enemy's Plans. I will get into to this a lot more a little later in another Tpic.

Now lets take the issue of UN Troops.

Patriots aka American Freedom Fighters must no have one slight bit of Compassion or Mercy for them, we must behave in a similar way to the Chechens where they slowly cut the heads off Russians but since we are Americans we need to do it another way but just as nasty.

My favorite way of doing this is to let them slowly die under Horses Hooves, and maybe to add insult to injury the Horses should first urinate and defecate on the Foreign Scum.

Or maybe as in the Movie The Beast we put UN Captives under Bulldozer Tracks feet first and we must get Videos and photos of the Horses or Bulldozers doing it so that we can send those Videos to the News Media of the Troopers Home Country.

Let the French, Germans, Brits etc watch on TV as their Countrymen get relieved on by Horses before dieing under the hooves or turned into Paste under Bulldozers.

How long would it take before France, Germany, England etc pull their Troops out of the United States, I believe it would not take very long.

To finish off this post I will say this.

What Patriots need to do is start thinking outside the Box that we seem to be Trapped in.

Come up with New Ideas and ways to Fight and Win a Civil War and then put those Ideas into Practice.

And stop worrying about what happens to Non-combatants of the Enemy Variety meaning Liberal Non-combatants.

Our Friends we always need to care about but this does not extend to our Ememies.

Right now Obama has just under 19 months left in office, so if the Next President is Pro 2nd Amendment he or she can Repeal the UN Arms Control Treaty.

So what is the Probability that lets say Trump, Paul or Cruz if elected would Repeal it and if Repealed what would be the consequences if any?

I will take an educated guess that the UN would be really ticked off but they don't have the ability to do anything significant about it.

Total War - Carl von Clausewitz style.

"To achieve victory we must mass our forces at the hub of all power and movement. 'the enemy's center of gravity. . ."

Screw the blue hats!

If this gets rammed through, the next president rejects it, if they whine about it, we withdraw from the UN!

Can we evict them from New York City?

If you can't circumvent UN regulations as skillfully as the average teenager in Somalia does on a regular basis, then you probably just need to go cry in your pillow when your local Walmart gun counter closes down.

I know the game and how to play it. The last couple operations I had to pull were done solo because people who talk the most shit are too emotionally weak to handle the action. Handling business? Fat chance. As soon as there is any legal prohibition on any guns or their ownership by certain people at all the game changes to being entirely about stealing and snitching. You put the beat down on the stealing and snitching, then watch those UN mandated regulations get ignored as often as a 55mph speed limit on the highways outside Detroit.

Those of us who know how to play will play, and it's not about firing up every "liberal" you spot driving their Subaru through the boondocks.

I quit the clandestine arms trade years ago not because I could not handle the action or get the right stuff to the right customers, it was the constant stealing and snitching done by exactly the kinds of people who talk the biggest talk in defending freedoms and liberties. Recent events in Washington only confirm that.

It is why several years ago now I recognized the need for the autonomous zones to be developed. Areas where true freedom would be the rule, not the exception. Obviously to some of us at least, that got fucked off by the very same kinds of people who want to march around waving guns on the lawns of state Capitol buildings while trying to extort and enslave others into enhancing their wealth quotient.

Under the Constitution that UN Treaty can not be used to Justify Gun Control / Confiscation because it is a violation of the 2nd Amendment, which takes precedence.

Also under the General Rule of Constitutional Law.
If Obama orders Law enforcement to Confiscate Firearms because of the UN Treaty any action taken by Gun Owners to Resist Confiscation including killing UN Blue Helmets or other Gun Confiscators is legal and Gun Owners can not be Convicted.
Also any Law Enforcer attempting to Enforce this Unconstitutional Law would not be protected from the consequences of his actions.
If a Law Enforcer were to Kill a Gun Owner who was resisting Confiscation, that Law Enforcer could be Prosecuted and convicted for Murder, since he, under the Constitution could not use the Defense that he was just enforcing the Law and following orders.

An Unconstitutional Law is No Law
From Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statue leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.

Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it ...

A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby.

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. -- Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177

White House: Obama Preparing More Executive Actions on Gun Control

President Obama Holds Election Night Event In Chicago

by Charlie Spiering 5 Oct 20150

The White House confirmed that President Obama was preparing a series of executive actions on gun control to match his recent passion on the issue after the latest mass shooting in Oregon.

“It’s a high priority and will continue to be until we start to see more progress on this issue in this town,” White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told reporters today at the press briefing.

Earnest said he would “quibble” with anyone who criticized the president for not voicing any specific gun control proposals during his press conference, asserting that the White House was working behind the scenes for more executive actions on guns.

“I can tell you that they’re not stumped, they’re continuing to review the law that’s on the books and continuing to consult with legal authorities but also others who may have ideas about what steps that can be taken to keep guns out of the hands of criminals,” Earnest said.

He admitted, however that he had no details for what the White House was working on, but asserted that the process was a “scrub” that was “ongoing.”

Earnest welcomed Hillary Clinton’s own gun control proposals announced this morning, but admitted that he hadn’t seen the full details of the proposal.

He also pointedly criticized the “gun show loophole” for allowing criminals and people with mental problems to buy weapons, blaming organizations like the National Rifle Association for blocking action in Congress on the issue.