AWRM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
NSA to Congress: F@ck Off #156932
01/15/2014 01:47 PM
01/15/2014 01:47 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,735
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content OP
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content OP
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,735
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
NSA to Congress: F@ck Off


Washington’s Blog
January 15, 2014

We’ve shown that the NSA has been spying on Congress for some time.

The NSA has never denied that it’s spying on Congress. Instead, the NSA first said:

Members of Congress have the same privacy protections as all US persons.

And Friday, NSA chief Keith Alexander wrote a letter to Senator Bernie Sanders saying that the NSA cannot reveal whether the agency has been targeting members of Congress in its metadata collection because doing so would violate privacy provisions accorded to civilians in the program:

The telephone metadata program incorporates extraordinary controls to protect Americans’ privacy interests. Among those protections is the condition that NSA can query the metadata only based on phone numbers reasonably suspected to be associated with specific foreign terrorist groups. For that reason, NSA cannot lawfully search to determine if any records NSA has received under the program have included metadata of the phone calls of any member of Congress, other American elected officials, or any other American without that predicate.

This is the exact same excuse the NSA and other intelligence agencies have previously given for hiding how many Americans they spy on.

As Wired reported last June:

The surveillance experts at the National Security Agency won’t tell two powerful United States Senators how many Americans have had their communications picked up by the agency as part of its sweeping new counterterrorism powers. The reason: it would violate your privacy to say so.

That claim comes in a short letter sent Monday to civil libertarian Senators Ron Wyden and Mark Udall. The two members of the Senate’s intelligence oversight committee asked the NSA a simple question last month: under the broad powers granted in 2008′s expansion of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, how many persons inside the United States have been spied upon by the NSA?

The query bounced around the intelligence bureaucracy until it reached I. Charles McCullough, the Inspector General of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the nominal head of the 16 U.S. spy agencies. In a letter acquired by Danger Room, McCullough told the senators that the NSA inspector general “and NSA leadership agreed that an IG review of the sort suggested would itself violate the privacy of U.S. persons,” McCullough wrote.

In other words, the NSA is sending the same message to both the American people and their representatives in Congress: f@ck off.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: NSA to Congress: F@ck Off #156933
01/16/2014 11:46 AM
01/16/2014 11:46 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,735
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content OP
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content OP
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,735
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
Washington can't be all bad.

Quote
Washington State Moves To Block NSA Surveillance


Bill would cut electricity & water to physical NSA locations

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
January 16, 2014


Washington State Rep. Matt Shea (R) has introduced a “Fourth Amendment Protection Act’ that would block all unlawful NSA surveillance and lay the groundwork for other states to follow suit.

House BIll 2272 (PDF), which also received bipartisan backing from Representatives Taylor, Moscoso, Overstreet, Scott, Blake, and Condotta, would codify Washington State’s refusal to allow the federal government to collect the electronic information of its citizens without a warrant.

“It is the policy of this state to refuse material support, participation, or assistance to any federal agency which claims the power, or with any federal law, rule, regulation, or order which purports to authorize, the collection of electronic data or metadata of any person pursuant to any action not based on a warrant that particularly describes the person, place, and thing to be searched or seized,” states the bill.

Crucially, the legislation would prohibit state-owned utilities from providing water and electricity to physical NSA locations in the state like the U.S. Army’s Yakima Training Center, which serves as an NSA listening post. The bill would also ban public universities from serving as NSA research facilities.

“We’re running with this bill to provide protection against the ever increasing surveillance into the daily lives of our citizens,” said Republican lawmaker David Taylor. “Our Founding Fathers established a series of checks and balances in the Constitution. Given the federal government’s utter failure to address the people’s concerns, it’s up to the states to stand for our citizens’ constitutional rights.”

Section 4 of the bill also blocks funds for political subdivisions that collaborate with any branch of the federal government in aiding in the mass surveillance of citizens of the state.

The legislation also forbids information provided by a federal agency which has been obtained via warrantless surveillance from being used in criminal investigations.

“We know the NSA shares data with state and local law enforcement,” said the Tenth Amendment Center’s Mike Maharrey. “We know that most of this shared data has absolutely nothing to do with national security issues. This bill would make that information inadmissible in state court. This data sharing shoves a dagger into the heart of the Fourth Amendment. This bill would stop that from happening. This is a no-brainer. Every state should do it.”


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: NSA to Congress: F@ck Off #156934
01/16/2014 12:15 PM
01/16/2014 12:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,917
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,917
Tulsa
The bill would only prevent "state-owned" utilities from providing support to the NSA installations. Does the State of Washington provide utilities to those installations now?

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: NSA to Congress: F@ck Off #156935
01/17/2014 07:02 AM
01/17/2014 07:02 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,917
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,917
Tulsa
You can't make this stuff up. Seriously. According to President Obama, the NSA is just like Paul Revere and the Sons of Liberty .

Quote
At the dawn of our Republic, a small, secret surveillance committee borne out of the “The Sons of Liberty” was established in Boston. The group’s members included Paul Revere, and at night they would patrol the streets, reporting back any signs that the British were preparing raids against America’s early Patriots....
Ummm... no. I don't think Paul Revere would have been an NSA sort of guy.

He also went on to assure the rest of the world that he wasn't listening on on their phone calls:

Quote
... The bottom line is that people around the world, regardless of their nationality, should know that the United States is not spying on ordinary people who don’t threaten our national security and that we take their privacy concerns into account in our policies and procedures.

This applies to foreign leaders as well. Given the understandable attention that this issue has received, I’ve made clear to the intelligence community that unless there is a compelling national security purpose, we will not monitor the communications of heads of state and government of our close friends and allies....
Good luck explaining that to German Chancellor Merkel, considering that President Obama personally approved tapping her telephone.

President Obama then trotted out the old claim that the NSA program could have prevented 9/11:

Quote
...The program grew out of a desire to address a gap identified after 9/11. One of the 9/11 hijackers—Khalid al-Mihdhar—made a phone call from San Diego to a known al Qaeda safe-house in Yemen. NSA saw that call, but could not see that it was coming from an individual already in the United States. The telephone metadata program under Section 215 was designed to map the communications of terrorists, so we can see who they may be in contact with as quickly as possible....
Well, it sure didn't prevent the Tsarnaev brothers from bombing the Boston Marathon last year, even after the Russians warned us the two were up to something.

So, how is the NSA reforming the NSA civil espionage program?

Quote
...Effective immediately, we will only pursue phone calls that are two steps removed from a number associated with a terrorist organization instead of three. And I have directed the Attorney General to work with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court so that during this transition period, the database can be queried only after a judicial finding, or in a true emergency....
Wow. That's comforting. I feel a whole lot better now. :rolleyes:

Here is the Fourth Amendment:

Quote
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Not once, in President Obama's long speech, did he mention it. President Obama used to be a constitutional law professor. Not a good one, I'd wager.

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: NSA to Congress: F@ck Off #156936
01/17/2014 08:42 AM
01/17/2014 08:42 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,917
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,917
Tulsa
UPDATE: It has been 53 years to the day sin...s about the Military-Industrial complex. And here is President Obama, furthering its cause.

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: NSA to Congress: F@ck Off #156937
01/26/2014 06:18 PM
01/26/2014 06:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,917
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,917
Tulsa
This is just flat-out creepy. The NSA has created a website for children.

[Linked Image]

Quote
CryptoKids® America's Future Codemakers & Codebreakers

Hi Kids!

Welcome to the NSA/CSS Kids’ page.

We’re the CryptoKids® and we love cryptology.

What’s cryptology? Cryptology is making and breaking codes. It’s so cool. We make codes so we can send secret messages to our friends. And we try to figure out what other people are writing about by breaking their codes. It’s a lot of fun.

On this site, you can learn all about codes and ciphers, play lots of games and activities, and get to know each of us - Crypto Cat®, Decipher Dog®, Rosetta Stone®, Slate®, Joules™, T.Top®, CyberTwins™ Cy and Cyndi, and, of course, our leader CSS Sam®.

You can also learn about the National Security Agency/Central Security Service - they’re America’s real codemakers and codebreakers. Our Nation’s leaders and warfighters count on the technology and information they get from NSA/CSS to get their jobs done. Without NSA/CSS, they wouldn’t be able to talk to one another without the bad guys listening and they wouldn’t be able to figure out what the bad guys were planning.

We hope you have lots of fun learning about cryptology and NSA/CSS. You might be part of the next generation of America’s codemakers and codebreakers.
You just can't make this stuff up.

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: NSA to Congress: F@ck Off #156938
01/27/2014 04:04 AM
01/27/2014 04:04 AM
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,246
North Carolina
S
safetalker Offline
Member
safetalker  Offline
Member
S
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,246
North Carolina
You have understand a little repeated piece of the problem.
The NSA hired 30,000 hackers, breakers, and geeks in the 2004 to 2010. If they fired these guys there would be 30,000 more Snowdens out there sharing what our elected felons want kept secret so they don't go to jail.

There only choice would be to execute them and that would make 60,000 more enemies since all of them have pards, sibilings, and parents.

So they back them out of self preservation!


.
©>
©All information posted on this site is the private property of the individual author and AWRM.net and may not be reproduced without permission. © 2001-2020 AWRM.net All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1