Forums

North Korea

Posted By: ConSigCor

North Korea - 04/05/2013 09:37 PM

North Korea positions nuclear missiles http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...-moves-second-missile-to-east-coast.html

North Korea Warns Embassies of Conflict Risk as Missiles Move http://www.cnbc.com/id/100618963
Posted By: airforce

Re: North Korea - 04/08/2013 09:33 AM

A U.S. Army WMD battalion has been deployed to South Korea. The battalion is equipped to respond to nuclear, biological, and chemical attacks. The Army says the deployment is "coincidental," but I don't think anyone is really buying that.

Meanwhile, South Korean officials are saying there is no indication North Korea is about to conduct another nuclear test. That's way different from what the rest of the world is saying.

Onward and upward,
airforce
Posted By: Asher

Re: North Korea - 04/08/2013 10:58 AM

Any wonder this is happening when Chona is having a dispute with Japan? I think its time we let Japan off their military restrictions leash...
Posted By: safetalker

Re: North Korea - 04/08/2013 01:10 PM

Asher
Go back and re-read your history of before the 2nd WW. The Japanese invaded Manchuria. They killed every one they could get their hands on. The women were all raped from age 7 and up. Then they extracted all the gold from their teeth while they were alive. Then they were bayoneted and thrown into mass graves. The took every piece of Gold in the nation from every religious shrines, graveyard, and home. They shipped this gold to Korea where it was melted into ingots and shipped to the Emperor. Then they moved into Korea and worked their way down the coast to Hong Kong. repeating the crimes and killing raping and stealing.
In the Philippines they lined up the people and those women who had good teeth were put in Whore Houses as training Geisha's for the lower ranks, The rest had the same treatment as the Koreans and Manchurians and Chinese.
This was done while the world watched.
If the Koreans had a missile that would reach Japan Fukushima would be considered a resort by now. The South Koreans would be sending letters of congratulations to them.
May God have mercy on their souls in the Philippinos get one.
(Look on Netflix for the movie "The Rape of Nanking" if you doubt me.
Posted By: Archangel1

Re: North Korea - 04/08/2013 04:00 PM

To add to Safetalker's comments,

The Japanese also ran biological warfare experimental centers in China before and during WWII. There are high rates of some very rare diseases to this day because of it. They killed a high percentage of captured Americans in the death march in the Philipines. One estimate suggested that 1/20 (5%) of the filipino population was killed by the Japanese during WWII. The Japanese believed that their Emperor was decended from a sea god and they lived by a warrior code for centuries where the Emperor's word was final.

On the other end of the spectrum, we nuked Hiroshima and Nagasaki and left them with long term radiation to end WWII. We fire bombed Tokyo to the ground. We killed so many pilots that they resorted to kamakazi tactics with untrained pilots in an attempt to respond. We incarcerated 113,000 Japanese US-immigants and their US citizen families in the US and wiped out the finances of many of the rest. We removed their ability to rebuild a military and have had a strong military presence in Japan for nearly 70 years. 1000 Japanese were put to death for war crimes and 4400 others were incarcerated.

China, Korea and the Philipines may still have hatred, but the Japanese have been "tamed" for lack of a better word. They have high rates of suicide, their economy has drifted for 25 years, and they keep trying to use Keynesian economic theory to stimulate their economy which is the same as bludgeoning them economically.

Launching a Nuke on Japan now would only END WWIII badly for everyone.
Posted By: ConSigCor

Re: North Korea - 04/09/2013 06:39 AM

Japan deploys missile defenses in Tokyo amid North Korea concerns
http://edition.cnn.com/2013/04/08/world/asia/koreas-tensions/index.html
Posted By: Imagrunt

Re: North Korea - 04/09/2013 07:13 AM

I do not intend to make light of the situation.

However:

When I completed my university thesis work on nuclear weapons, I referenced an unclassified CIA study completed in the 1970s which listed the top three nuclear threat.

Ready for the list? This may look familiar.

Iran

North Korea

Pakistan

Again, not making light, but within the context of needing a Bogey-Man, the .mil complex truly regrets waxing Bin Laden and Saddam. They got a lot of good mileage out of those guys (ghosts).

IMO, Kim Jung Un is the new Bogey-Man; the new "Michael Jackson Distraction" in the MSM spotlight to keep us from focusing on the fiat money economic implosion.

Yes, there will be war, including mortal combat, but in terms of progress, economic warfare is obviously waging in earnest, with far less collateral damage, and mortal combat will only increase as the result of sheer desperation on the part of the .gov perpetrators.

FEAR mongering is intended for the Sheople masses; not for We the People.

Keep your chins up!
Posted By: ConSigCor

Re: North Korea - 04/09/2013 07:55 AM

TPTB want a new conflict to distract the masses from paying attention to the ongoing economic collapse. Plus a war gives them an excuse to implement more tyranny at home, all in the guise of homeland security.

Stewart Rhodes and Brandon Smith on N.Korea, the Economy,
http://youtu.be/4wNU3IKe3S0
Posted By: airforce

Re: North Korea - 04/10/2013 12:57 PM

Dick Cheney says the U.S. is in "deep doo-doo" on North Korea. And he should know about such things.

Quote
...Southerland, summarizing the former vice president’s remarks, said Cheney advised not to “eliminate any possibility.”

“Here's a young guy we don't know very much about – have very little intel on him, so we just need to make sure that we don't assume why he's doing what he's doing because he could be doing what he's doing for any number of reasons,” Southerland recalled Cheney saying....
And defense Secretary Hagel says North Korea is "approaching a dangerous line," whatever that means.

Onward and upward,
airforce
Posted By: ConSigCor

Re: North Korea - 04/11/2013 06:03 AM

http://news.sky.com/story/1076650/north-koreas-missiles-in-upright-position

http://www.prisonplanet.com/chinese-professor-70-80-chance-of-war-with-north-korea.html

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/04/top-economic-advisers-forecast-war-and-unrest-2.html
Posted By: safetalker

Re: North Korea - 04/11/2013 08:38 AM

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/04/03/what-is-going-on-with-north-korea-is-not-what-it-seems/
Posted By: Archangel1

Re: North Korea - 04/11/2013 11:38 AM

The journalist is smoking something. What a bunch of blather.

Roosevelt died of a stroke. He was older, sickly and smoked which tends to line with stroke.
A tsunami hit Japan after an earthquake causing the nuclear plant meltdown.
Posted By: ConSigCor

Re: North Korea - 04/12/2013 06:48 AM

http://www.debka.com/article/22893/...zes-masses-troops-on-North-Korean-border

http://www.prisonplanet.com/who-gave-north-korea-nukes-in-the-first-place.html
Posted By: The Greywolf

Re: North Korea - 04/12/2013 06:49 PM

Quote
Originally posted by ConSigCor:
TPTB want a new conflict to distract the masses from paying attention to the ongoing economic collapse. Plus a war gives them an excuse to implement more tyranny at home, all in the guise of homeland security.

Stewart Rhodes and Brandon Smith on N.Korea, the Economy,
http://youtu.be/4wNU3IKe3S0
What CSC said.....
Posted By: Breacher

Re: North Korea - 04/12/2013 10:20 PM

http://www.youtube.com/edit?ns=1&video_id=ZY8PMRaAwXk
Posted By: OLM-Medic

Re: North Korea - 04/13/2013 01:08 AM

Pre-emptive strike = attacking a nation unprovoked

A draft = slavery

Remember that. A draft might be the final straw for some.
Posted By: Leo

Re: North Korea - 04/13/2013 12:57 PM

I had to same thoughts. A draft would draw many potential patriots. While deployed, gut the country of its rights and finish off the resistance. When they come home, if they come home would find it to be a different place.

Just a thought anyway.
Posted By: fal3

Re: North Korea - 04/13/2013 05:05 PM

Cute little game, this. And I'm not sure who is playing it better, the US or N. Korea. But, it is most certainly a game. This is not true conflict, and won't be. Any trained military strategist knows this is just a game.

WHAT can North Korea expect to accomplish by bombing Tokyo ? Will the Japanese surrender, and ask North Korea to become it's new mommy ?

If the North Koreans somehow were to get a missile all the way to Guam, what would that accomplish ? It would be like swatting a hornet's nest in mid-day.

And, what could be accomplished by an invasion of South Korea ? The starving North Korean troops would soon come to a grinding halt with a complete armada of western ships ringing the country so that NO re-supply could ever reach the north country.

North Korea is playing a nice game, and it is helping the Obama administration look tough (in some eyes, if that is possible).

We will end up "averting a massive, long-term war in which tens of thousands of US soldiers might have been killed, and the US economy further damaged." How ? By giving the the enemy what they wanted to begin with...as we usually do. Supplies and money and status.

One additional gameplay is that we will cooperate with our new "dear ally, China," giving them our military information (so we won't "accidentally" shoot at each other). This will be helpful later when the communist government in the United States agrees to surrender to the more experienced and helpful Chinese Communists.

It's all a game.
Posted By: The Greywolf

Re: North Korea - 04/13/2013 05:21 PM

A dangerous game, wouldn't you rather play a nice game of chess?

A distraction for the media look what is going on in the back ground while the media watches this..

Or a Chance to drag the people into another war, while the Dictator Obama strengthens is grasp on us here.
© 2024 A WELL REGULATED MILITIA