11/23/2020 02:53 PM Take The High Road My Ass [by ConSigCor]

Sheriff David Clarke - Take The High Road My Ass

Imposter President-elect Joe Biden can take his call for unity and shove it.

Trump supporters should be appalled at the notion of it. Think about what we have endured for four straight years from the American left, the Democrats, and their accomplices in the media.

We had to endure insults, smears of being hate-filled racists. We had to endure physical attacks and intimidation at our businesses and in front of our homes. Some lost their jobs for being Trump supporters or saying something clumsy on social media. Trump supporters have had to go underground in their support of this duly elected President. We weren’t allowed to proudly display our patriotism. Both honoring the flag and Old Glory herself have been turned into symbols of white supremacy, superiority, and privilege.

White Trump supporters were called inherently biased just because of the color of their skin and made to undergo forced training about their inherent biases that didn’t exist.

Our children have been indoctrinated without our approval with toxic waste like critical race theory and that America continues to this day of being systemically racist in garbage fiction like the 1619 Project.

Black supporters are called traitors to their race. We have been bullied and harassed in public spaces. Putting a Trump bumper sticker on your car made it a target for vandalism. Wearing a MAGA hat made us targets for physical and verbal assault. We were silenced and had to whisper about our support for this President. Friends abandoned us because we had a different point of view about Trump.

We suffered in silence as our statues were toppled and removed and our history books were obliterated and altered. We watched as our cities were set on fire, our business were looted and torched, and the police were physically attacked and made to stand down as rioting went on unchecked. Those arrested were not held to account or charged with crimes, only to be immediately released from custody to re-join the fracas.

Lockdown orders by Governors in Democrat-controlled states in an effort to destroy Trump’s roaring economy led to businesses permanently closing, people losing their jobs, and onerous restrictions placed on our freedom and liberty.

At the national level, Trump never received a peaceful transition of power as Barack Obama aided by the deep state conspired to orchestrate a silent coup and undo the will of we the people, the voters who fairly elected Donald Trump and without cheating.

The FBI knowingly used a phony dossier paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign to obtain search warrants and wiretaps on the Trump campaign, an unprecedented move that led to the prosecution of Trump advisers like national security advisor General Michael Flynn (Ret) whose case still labors in federal court even after the US Justice Department admitted errors and department policy violations and asked that the case be dismissed.

An activist judge refuses to give Flynn justice by dismissing the case. There are no calls from the left on how justice delayed is justice denied. We had to endure a two-year phony Mueller Commission stacked with Clinton and Obama supporting lawyers and donors try to frame Trump with high crimes.

This was followed by a politically motivated impeachment devoid of proof of wrongdoing in an on-going attempt to remove Trump from office. We waited for those involved to be indicted. Those indictments never came and now never will.

We watched as Big Tech punished our free expression on social media sites by suspending us for picayune-ish reasons that they said violates their “terms of service” that always seem to be enforced on a sliding scale and only against conservatives.

We had to watch images like the bloody severed head of President Trump posted on social media and images of Trump hung in effigy that was called free speech. He was publicly compared to Hitler and other despicable tyrants.

This is just some of what we endured for four straight years and now Biden is calling for unity?


Get bent, dude.

Trump supporters need to make it very clear that there will be no such unity. Now it’s our turn. We need to do unto them as they did onto us. We don’t need to lose our souls doing it but we need to fight back, not call a truce. Never. Not after being tormented and terrorized for four straight years by the Democrat Party, Hollywood celebrities and CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times and the Washington Post, 24-7. It is time to give them a dose of their own medicine. If we don’t, we validate their evil. I won’t do that and neither should you.

We start by not recognizing Biden’s ill-gotten election gain, like the left did in not recognizing Trump. We must not see Biden as the legitimate President due to all the irregularities with the made-up along the way election rules in swing states. We must resist any attempt to normalize Joe Biden like leftist subversives from Share Blue, Media Matters, CREW, and American Bridge said in a confidential playbook about Donald Trump that I obtained.

We must demonize Biden and continually demand that the GOP led Senate investigate and conduct endless hearings over the Hunter Biden computer and Joe Biden’s role in it and his other corrupt associations. Let Biden have to drag this ball and chain around everywhere he goes. We must harass and frustrate any Biden administration attempts to govern. We must burden Biden officials with endless ethics complaints and other lawful tactics.

We are the insurgents now, the freedom fighters, the opposition. We will use the same guerrilla style political warfare tactics that the left designed. Let’s give them 4 years of hell like they gave us. Then they can let us know how it feels.

It’s not time for unity, it’s time for payback.
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦

Sheriff David Clarke Jr. is former Sheriff of Milwaukee Co, Wisconsin, President of AmericasSheriff LLC, an advisory Board member for We Build the Wall Inc, author of the book Cop Under Fire: Beyond Hashtags of Race Crime and Politics for a Better America.
1 14 Read More
11/20/2020 03:57 AM WEAPONIZED PSYCHIATRY [by ConSigCor]


November 19, 2020


This morning I made the mistake of watching CNN – I do it every day. I watch CNN then Fox News, MSNBC and Bloomberg.

But today, CNN was especially annoying.

CNN actually is reporting now that Donald Trump’s incessant assertion that the election was fraudulent is killing more people. They are literally reporting that since Trump will not capitulate and let Biden in to start the transition he is literally killing more Americans as COVID-19 has unexpectedly spiked putting a strain on our hospitals and killing thousands daily.

CNN reports that the longer Trump waits, the death tolls will continue to rise. It is starting to sound like a threat – as it is most concerning and coincidental that most of these new lockdowns are to continue until the Electoral College confirms the vote on December 14.

CNN reported that “All of this constitutional chicanery is coinciding with a pandemic that Trump ignored, denied and downplayed and is killing many thousands of Americans a week is only adding to the surreal sense of political purgatory in Washington caused by an outgoing President who is putting a bruised ego ahead of the health of hundreds of millions of Americans.”

Joe Biden is even saying that He and his administration are going to be behind by weeks and months being able to put together the whole initiative relating to the biggest promise he claims to have made and that is to distribute a vaccine from two drug companies that have a 95% effectiveness,

So in other words, they are holding back the distribution of the vaccine until Joe Biden becomes President.

They could release it now as it would be a panacea for those who are terrified – it would push us towards a semblance of normal – but no it again shows itself as yet another political football.

If Trump is playing so cavalier with human life as the media and the experts say then it appears that Joe Biden is too – what is stopping him from just handing out the vaccine like Santa hands out candy canes?

This is not science – this is not facts over fear – this is retaliation and vengeance.

CNN claims that they follow the science, so if it is a scientific fact that Trump’s investigation into election fraud is killing more Americans and that more will die if he does not concede, then perhaps we should conclude that there is fraud and negligence of another kind going on.

I still can’t figure out why so many Americans put faith in mainstream, corporate outlets for an accurate summary of the news. I guess people think they have no choice but to assume that what they are hearing or watching is being doled out by some commentator that has the monopoly on truth.

When it is said that the mainstream controls the narrative – it isn’t just an understatement. Six corporations own 90 percent of all media platforms in the U.S., effectively controlling the narrative, whether on foreign policy, legislation, or any goal fitting its needs.

Real news in the past was supposed to be objective, and people were not paid to go on national news programs to spew combative and scandalous drivel.

For decades there has always been this silent fear that America would adopt philosophy that lean towards real fascism. I’m not talking about the fascism where uneducated justice warriors define it as really bad people doing really bad things – I am talking about the true definition of living in a fascist state.

I know that we hear on the news every day that the resistance reminds us that Trump is a fascist, a racist, a white supremacist, and another Hitler.

Well if he is he is pretty bad at it. If people would actually read something like history or other books that describe true oppression and fascism they would understand that a true fascist president would have everyone in the so alleged resistance shot in the streets for insurrection.

So far, I have not seen that in this country but what I have seen are those who are quick to call out so called fascism have pretty detailed ideas on how to eradicate anyone who does not agree with them.

Fascism should not be used as a description for something we don’t like, but thanks to the media, and newspeak we have been able to accept the word without the means to define it.

For example if you Google, “fascism,” you get a very interesting definition of the word:

Google defines it as an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization. In general use extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.

If you look up the Webster’s Dictionary definition, you get a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition.

Fascism was founded during World War I by Italian national syndicalists who drew upon left-wing and right-wing political views.

The Fascisti were the members of an Italian political organization that controlled Italy under the fascist dictatorship of Benito Mussolini from 1922 to 1943.

Mussolini defined the three principles of a fascist philosophy.

1.”Everything in the state”. The Government is supreme and the country is all-encompassing, and all within it must conform to the ruling body, often a dictator.

2.”Nothing outside the state”. The country must grow and the implied goal of any fascist nation is to rule the world, and have every human submit to the government.

3.”Nothing against the state”. Any type of questioning the government is not to be tolerated. If you do not see things our way, you are wrong. If you do not agree with the government, you cannot be allowed to live and taint the minds of the rest of the good citizens.

The use of militarism was implied only as a means to accomplish one of the three above principles, mainly to keep the people and rest of the world in line. Fascist countries are known for their harmony and lack of internal strife. There are no conflicting parties or elections in fascist countries.

Nazi Germany was extreme Fascism; better examples of fascist countries were Mussolini’s Italy, Iraq, Iran, and many Middle Eastern countries.

Throughout my younger years I have read some pretty bleak books on the subjects of despotism, fascism, and dystopia.

“It Can’t Happen Here” by Sinclair Lewis is a work of dystopian fantasy, one man’s effort in the 1930s to imagine what it might look like if fascism came to America.

At a moment when instability seems to be the only constant in American politics, “It Can’t Happen Here” offers an alluring if not terrifying certainty: It can happen here, and what comes next will be even ghastlier than you expect.

The book talks about a would be candidate for president named Berzelius (Buzz) Windrip, a man that swoops in after the Depression –who calls himself champion of “Forgotten Men,” determined to bring dignity and prosperity back to America’s white working class. Windrip loves big, passionate rallies and rails against the “lies” of the mainstream press. His supporters embrace this message, lashing out against the “highbrow intellectuality” of editors and professors and policy elites.

Many opinionated Left wing writers have encouraged people to read the book and compare it to what President Trump has done in the last four years – but I would say that the protagonist in the story is hardly a stand in or even a facsimile of the president. On the surface it all sounds familiar but as the book continues we learn a lot about Windrip that detours away from what Trump is or stands for.

Windrip sweeps into office as a quasi-socialist, promising $3,000 to $5,000 for every “real American family.”

Upon moving into the White House, Windrip immediately declares Congress an “advisory” body, stripped of all real power. When members of Congress resist, he locks them up without the slightest semblance of due process, the beginning of the end for American democracy.

The rest of the book describes one long, disorienting nightmare, a national descent into martial law torture chambers and concentration camps. The camps were established to incarcerate and reeducate people to accept the new order in America.

“It Can’t Happen Here” is an argument for civic education and journalism as a basic pillar of democracy. Many Americans lack this today, regardless of their convictions.

Keeping people in an echo chamber and not allowing them to think openly makes them easily exploitable.

We have learned about several dystopian ends in Books like 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World how as they paint a bleak picture of totalitarian control that is intolerant of freedom of expression.

In 1984, Orwell gave us a perfect rendering of a totalitarian state’s use of violence and language to keep a people enslaved. However, quite contrary to the spirit and intention of its author, the book has been transformed by Americans into something worse than a metaphor — a cliché which does our thinking for us whenever we struggle to understand “something not desirable” in our politics.

The statement that Trump is a fascist or Orwellian pins the problem on one man when the fascist evolution has been taking place for decades.

In fact, beyond the fascist definitions provided by those who don’t know history are the more appropriate definitions of despotism and pathocracy.

Whereas 1984 was a dystopia built on the subjugation of a boot eternally stomping on a human face, Brave New World was a dystopia built on the idea of people that are too drugged and entertained to tell that they are living a lie.

The masses were, more or less, endlessly drugged and entertained and so that their opinions never had a chance to develop, or impaired at birth so they could never think. The tyranny in Brave New World was the tyranny of a vapid public who never thought beyond the most recent mindless and sexual encounter (strongly encouraged by the state) and the latest movie.

There is so much familiarity in these books because they are simply portents to human behavior and how absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Expressing one’s disdain for the way the media handles and election, or perhaps theorizing that perhaps we are seeing election fraud or that the COVID-19 pandemic is being exploited politically os now beingh condemned by an overzealous media that has more times than not called itself –“the resistance’.

We best be asking ourselves what is it that they wish to resist and what lengths will they go to to further their agendas –could they lie in order to hardened the resolve that the end justified the means?

How many times do we lie to ourselves because of our partisanship affiliation? It is happening more now than before and the frightening part is people believe the lies they tell themselves about what they think their choices in political preference gives them.

Subtlety has been part of the success of pathocracy and people ignore it because it is not obvious to them.

Pathocracy is the result of a macro social infestation of a viral meme that is detrimental to the consensus and weakens it. The problem that faces us is not the outward face of tyranny. We see the obvious indicators that there is a path being laid towards pathocracy however the success of tyranny is not based in the threat of rights being taken away, violence or being imprisoned in FEMA detainment camps.

The threat is how low we will lower the bar to tolerate evil and wickedness to eliminate those that our political party doesn’t agree with.

What I am about to tell you is terrifying –and it should hopefully shake you into understanding how subtle real fascism is.

On the same day that the World Economic Forum heralded “The Great Reset” as a positive way to build “future resilience to global risks,” the New York Times declared the entire thing to be a “conspiracy theory.” The NYT was apparently upset that “The Great Reset” was trending on Twitter and published an article declaring it to be “A baseless conspiracy theory about the coronavirus.”

In reality, the WEF, NGOs and world leaders have for months been hyping the need to exploit the “opportunity,” in the words of Justin Trudeau, provided by the pandemic to achieve “The Great Reset”.

The NYT report mentioned Trudeau, but buried the fact that he had openly labeled COVID-19 an “opportunity” during a UN conference call.

On the same day the Times asserted that the issue was a fever dream of “far-right internet commentators,” the World Economic Forum itself celebrated “The Great Reset” as a way to build “future resilience to global risks.”

The NYT report then calls it an “unfounded rumor” that elites are using the pandemic “to impose their global economic control on the masses,” despite the fact that Davos globalist Karl Schwab specifically announces this very agenda in his recent book, COVID-19: The Great Reset.

As we previously highlighted, Schwab also openly endorses a technocratic dictatorship whereby people would accept implantable microchips that can read their thoughts as well as brain scans to be allowed to travel.

Suffice to say, the Times completely failed to mention Schwab’s book at all.

The NYT then evidently contacted both Twitter and Facebook in an attempt to get information about “The Great Reset” removed, but Twitter refused to do so and Facebook didn’t respond.

So in other words, in its attempt to persuade people that the elite aren’t pursuing a nefarious “Great Reset.”

Meanwhile neurologist Bruce Miller from the University of California, San Francisco, published a paper earlier this month in the Journal of the American Medical Association where he attempts to pathologize those who believe in conspiracy theories and those who make them.

He especially focused his ire against those who indulge in conspiracy theories about COVID-19.

‘Conspiracy theorists’ who refuse to wear masks and embrace lockdowns are the victims of their own scientific illiteracy, which has fundamentally damaged their brains to such an extent that they cannot understand the science of COVID-19, People who believe in so-called conspiracy theories about COVID-19 are actually suffering from “neuropsychological impairments.”

I remember saying a while ago that experts and so called scientists will find a way to abuse their power and make statements that spin political views with their own scientific opinions. This leads to exclusion, accusations of heresy, and what was seen as Soviet-era weaponized psychiatry.

Bruce Miller leverages his formidable credentials – he’s both director of the Memory and Aging Center and co-director of the Global Brain Health Institute at UCSF – to legitimize a baseless and frankly dangerous theory that could potentially be used to lock those same “conspiracy theorists” away in psychiatric facilities indefinitely. His questionable paper takes the pathologization of dissent even a step further than recent bogus “anti-maskers are sociopaths” studies, to a very dark, totalitarian place – ironically, the exact same endpoint feared by the conspiracy theorists he so glibly patronizes.

Miller equates “anti-mask behavior,” “anti-vaccine beliefs,” and “conspiracy theories about the origins of Covid-19” with “denial of science,” blaming the whole package on low levels of science literacy rooted in poor-quality education. While the quality of US science education is certainly dismal, Miller’s reductionist viewpoint leaves no room for the many intelligent, educated people who hold these views.

His area of expertise may be in delusional disorders, but writing off informed dissent as delusion born of ignorance is, well, ignorant and delusional.

Again, Miller is a scientist and it is terrifying to think that this is the science he pushes –and the question is how far can a scientist take this knowing that now we may have a new President that says he follows the science?

Does he support this science? If he does then we have a lot to fear.

Bruce Miller’s paper goes one step beyond the usual establishment sneering, however. Tracing the origin of “conspiracy theories” to an organic brain defect reeks of the Soviet weaponization of psychiatry, a dark chapter in history that seems – if papers like this are any indication – poised to repeat itself. During the 1960s and 1970s, the USSR weaponized psychiatry to institutionalize political dissidents, diagnosing them with mental illness – because after all, one would have to be crazy not to embrace communism! – and locking them away. The practice served to neutralize the targeted individual, marginalize others who shared his opinions, and terrify the rest of the population into keeping their doubts about the system to themselves.

If Miller’s scientifically baseless theory that belief in conspiracies represents an organic brain defect is embraced by the medical establishment (and there’s no reason to suspect it won’t be), dissidents could find themselves locked up indefinitely as incurable “cases.”

Countries are also changing their laws to make it easier to institutionalize political targets. One of the changes to UK law rammed through in its emergency legislation package reduced the number of medical professionals signing off on the decision to “section” (institutionalize) an individual from two to one. And now, American doctors are licking their lips at the possibility of sidelining those troublesome conspiracy theorists once and for all.

They are just waiting for the go ahead from leaders who follow the science and want to put down those who do not follow the science they do.

Are these the behaviors of governments that have nothing to hide? To assume that there is a fixed definition of the term “conspiracy theory” is ludicrous – that is why it is obvious that what is being proposed is to jail heretics and dissidents—what is being proposed is literally the Orwellian equivalent of “Ignorance is Strength.

If the treatment of those labelled as “conspiracy theorists” in our culture is analogous to the treatment of those labelled as “heretics” in medieval Europe, then the role of psychologists and social scientists in this treatment is analogous to that of the Inquisition.

Whenever we use the terms “conspiracy theory”, “conspiracism” or “conspiracist ideation”, we’re implying, even if we don’t mean to, there is something wrong with believing, wanting to investigate, or giving any credence at all to the possibility people are engaged in secretive or deceptive behavior.

One bad effect of these terms is they contribute to a political environment in which it’s easier for conspiracy to thrive at the expense of openness. Another bad effect is their use is an injustice to the people who are characterized as conspiracy theorists.

When someone asserts that a conspiracy has taken place (especially when it is a conspiracy by powerful people or institutions) that person’s word is automatically given less credence than it should because of an irrational prejudice associated with the pejorative connotations of these terms.

When professional psychologists imply these terms it can constitute a form of gaslighting; that is, a manipulation of people into doubting their own sanity.
1 7 Read More
11/19/2020 05:58 PM Now Is The Time To Rebel [by ConSigCor]
Now Is The Time For Americans To Rebel Against Lockdowns, Mask Laws And Forced Vaccination

November 18, 2020
by Brandon Smith

With the presidential election highly contested and the mainstream media hyping the rising infection numbers, the public is now facing important questions regarding the future of the pandemic response. Some states have decided to unilaterally introduce “executive orders” to restrict citizen movements, business openings and public activities.

Anthony Fauci is on the news constantly, calling for families to cancel Thanksgiving and Christmas and telling Americans to just “do what we are told”. The media is generally trying to drum up fear in the minds of the populace and paint images of plague and death everywhere. If Biden does actually end up in the White House, a federalized and national high level lockdown is on the table starting in January.

In April of this year I published an article titled ‘Waves Of Mutilation: Medical Tyranny And The Cashless Society’, which outlined a social engineering model put forward by globalists at MIT and the Imperial College of London which I called “wave theory”. The model essentially works like this:

Governments must use the pandemic as a rationale for “waves” of restrictive lockdowns, followed by controlled re-openings of the economy and of normal human activity. Globalists claim that this will “slow” the spread of the coronavirus and save lives. However, they also openly admit that these cycles of closures and openings have other uses.

Over time, the citizenry becomes acclimated to governmental intrusion in their everyday lives, and they get used to the idea of bureaucracy telling them what they are not allowed to do when it comes to the simplest activities. The system thus bottlenecks all human interactions to the point that we are constantly asking for permission. We become slaves to the Covid response.

As globalist Gideon Lichfield from MIT stated in his article ‘We’re Not Going Back To Normal’:

“Ultimately, however, I predict that we’ll restore the ability to socialize safely by developing more sophisticated ways to identify who is a disease risk and who isn’t, and discriminating—legally—against those who are.

…one can imagine a world in which, to get on a flight, perhaps you’ll have to be signed up to a service that tracks your movements via your phone. The airline wouldn’t be able to see where you’d gone, but it would get an alert if you’d been close to known infected people or disease hot spots. There’d be similar requirements at the entrance to large venues, government buildings, or public transport hubs. There would be temperature scanners everywhere, and your workplace might demand you wear a monitor that tracks your temperature or other vital signs. Where nightclubs ask for proof of age, in future they might ask for proof of immunity—an identity card or some kind of digital verification via your phone, showing you’ve already recovered from or been vaccinated against the latest virus strains.”

Note that Lichfield suggested that in order to participate in the normal economy you might need to show verification that you have been “vaccinated against the latest virus strains”. In other words, the elites expect there to be many more viral events or mutations AFTER Covid 19 has run its course, and the restrictions and controls we see today are meant to continue, possibly FOREVER.

The reality is that the wave model is not a very practical plan for stopping viral spread, but it is a perfect method for conditioning people to submit to a high level of control over their personal lives that they never would have accepted otherwise. The Covid response has also been heralded by elites at the World Economic Forum as a perfect “opportunity” to initiate what they call the “Great Reset”. The reset is a plan to deconstruct what’s left of the free market capitalist system, introduce carbon controls in the name of the global warming fraud, institute a global cashless monetary system, and finally, move humanity into what they call a “shared economy” in which the average person is no longer allowed to own private property of any kind and is completely dependent on the system for their basic necessities.

Of course, such a complex system of “solutions” (dominance) over every individual would need to be managed in a highly centralized way. Meaning, global governance by the elitist establishment would be the end result. Naturally….the globalists would reluctantly take the reins of power for “the greater good”.

This is the bigger picture, the underlying threat at the core of the lockdowns and Covid laws. That said, there are also numerous arguments based on logic and evidence as to why there is no reason for people to submit to such restrictions. Let’s outline them in a simple list:

The Coronavirus Kills Less Than 1% Of The People It Infects

Medical studies in the US indicate that the coronavirus deaths rate for citizens NOT living in nursing homes has been holding well below 1% on average. The largest percentage of deaths by far in the US has been in nursing homes among elderly people with preexisting conditions. People in long term care facilities make up 8% of Covid infection cases but they are 45% of all covid deaths.

Pneumonia alone kills around 50,000 Americans each year according to the CDC, and that’s with vaccinations, yet, we are supposed to panic and hand over all our freedoms in the name of stopping a disease which affects a tiny percentage of the population? This is why the media and governments have decided to hyperfocus on infection numbers rather than deaths. The death numbers do not warrant the amount of panic the establishment is trying to foment.

Lockdowns Destroy The Economy

It’s basic math and finance; the small business sector of the US economy is dying. Small businesses make up around 50% of US employment. The Covid bailout money, handled by international banks like JP Morgan, did not get to the vast majority of small businesses that were supposed to receive it. Those businesses that did get bailouts are still on the verge of closure or bankruptcy. Any further lockdowns will be the final nail in the coffin for the US economy, except for major corporations which are enjoying the lion’s share of stimulus cash.

How many lives will be damaged or lost due to poverty and economic collapse if the current trend continues? I suspect far more than any lives lost because of Covid.

Why is no one in the mainstream talking about the most practical solution to the pandemic? The small percentage of people who are most at risk can STAY HOME and take precautions as necessary, while the rest of us get on with our lives. Why are we being ordered to do the exact opposite just to make less than 1% of the population feel safer? How is this logical, reasonable or scientific? The only answer that makes sense is that the lockdown response is about control, not saving lives.

State Governors Have No Authority To Take Away Your Civil Liberties, And Neither Does The President

Restrictions based on executive orders have no legal authority under the Constitution. They are color of law, not true law. Laws are debated and passed by state legislatures, not by state governors. Executive orders only apply to state employees and have no bearing on the citizenry.

Leftists and statists argue that during a national crisis the governor has emergency powers and states can do whatever they want. This is false. Under the constitution and the Bill of Rights, state governors do not get to proclaim a national emergency based on their personal opinion and then declare themselves dictators in response. Any “laws” exerted because of such a process are therefor null and void; they are meaningless.

If the states have the ability to do whatever they want without oversight, then they would be able to bring back Jim Crow laws (among other things). Do leftists support that idea as well? If the federal government and the president have the power to violate the Bill of Rights during a national emergency, then Donald Trump has the authority to bring in martial law across the country because of leftist riots. Do leftists agree with that outcome?

It is interesting to me that the political left in particular is so keen on defending the idea of states and governors having the power to unilaterally enforce pandemic restrictions without oversight or checks and balances. Yet, they have been aggressively opposed to state powers in the past when they had a Democratic president like Obama in office. The left has also been staunchly opposed to executive orders applied by Donald Trump, but they applaud the idea of executive orders on lockdowns being instituted by Biden.

So, leftists support unilateral state power only when it works in favor of their agenda, and they support unilateral federal and presidential power only when it works in favor of their agenda. What a surprise…

The bottom line is this: State government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. Federal government powers do not supersede the Bill of Rights. NO ONE has the legal power to take away your inherent liberties. Those that claim otherwise have something to gain from your enslavement.

Mask Laws Are Unscientific

The majority of masks being used by the public today are cloth masks. Not even the CDC recommends the use of cloth masks for their own employees or medical workers. They only recommend N95 masks. They also admit that cloth masks are much less effective at preventing contact with the virus. Yet, the CDC supports the enforcement of cloth masks for the public.

On top of that, some states and countries with the most stringent mask laws continue to see huge spikes in coronavirus infections. For example, New York has been one of the most tyrannical enforcers of mask laws and lockdowns in the US, but in November the state has witnessed extensive infection increases. California, Michigan and Illinois have also seen dramatic infection spikes this month despite hard enforcement of masks. So, where is the science?

It would appear that masks are a placebo; if they actually worked, then the states with the most aggressive enforcement should be seeing a dramatic downturn in cases, not exponential increases.

Furthermore, why are many states and countries trying to force citizens to wear masks outside in open air and sunlight when viruses cannot survive in such conditions? UV light from the sun is nature’s sterilizer, but no one in the mainstream or in government acknowledges this scientific fact. Again, this shows that mask laws are about control, not about science or saving lives.

Covid Vaccination Is Unnecessary And Potentially Dangerous

Why should people get vaccinated for a virus that over 99% of them will easily survive anyway? Why not simply attain “herd immunity” through natural infection spread and antibodies? The mainstream will continue to ignore these questions because they are inconvenient to the wider agenda.

Also, why should anyone trust a vaccine that was rushed out in less than a year’s time? China and the rest of the world spent over a decade trying to develop a vaccine for SARS unsuccessfully, but we are supposed to believe that they created a vaccine for SARS related Covid 19 within months?

The last time the government rushed out a vaccine for a viral epidemic was the 1976 swine flu scare, and that ended with numerous permanently damaged or dead individuals due to faulty vaccines.

As I noted in my article ‘Why The Public Should Rebel Against Forced Vaccinations’, published in May, there are numerous examples of vaccine tests and implementation going very wrong, from Bill Gates and the World Health Organization giving people polio in various countries through vaccines, to Novartis and their deadly testing of a Bird Flu vaccine on homeless people in Poland, to GlaxoSmithCline and the deaths of children due to their pneumonia vaccine.

Again, it’s simply not worth the risk over a virus that over 99% of people will survive. The idea of such risk being forced on the public is completely unacceptable, but many government officials have supported the idea over the past six months. It is important for the public to make it clear now that they will NOT be allowing state or federal governments to make vaccination mandatory.

Rebellion Is Needed To Put A Stop To The Fear Machine

In closing, there are endless reasons why we must end the pandemic lockdown agenda once and for all. Most importantly, the lockdowns, mask orders and vaccine plans are a stepping stone to something much worse – Medical tyranny and centralization on an unprecedented scale. I will not personally follow such rules because they are not scientifically or morally sound. They are nonsense designed to frighten the public into complacency and consent.

A rebellion against such measures would be very easy to win. All we have to do is refuse to follow their mandates. What are they going to do? Lock up millions of people? Shoot us? That would sort of defeat the supposed purpose of the very measures they demand we follow. And, if it comes to violence, so be it. I have no problem fighting to defend my freedoms and the freedoms of future generations. Perhaps it is time for conservatives and moderates that stand against the lockdowns to organize for this possible future.

0 9 Read More
11/19/2020 06:14 AM Oregon Gov. Threatens Jail Time & Fines [by ConSigCor]
Oregon Gov. Kate Brown Threatens Jail Time & Fines For Anybody Who Violates COVID-19 Thanksgiving Restrictions

By Jamie White | INFOWARS.COM Wednesday, November 18, 2020

Oregon’s Democrat Governor Kate Brown imposed severely restrictive COVID-19 measures on Wednesday, including jail time and steep fines for anybody who hosts large Thanksgiving gatherings.

Brown announced the state’s “two week freeze” on virtually all businesses and recreational activities, essentially shuttering the state’s economy in response to rising COVID-19 cases (but extremely low death rate).

“If COVID-19 overwhelms our hospitals, there won’t be enough doctors, nurses, health care workers, or beds if you or a loved one need care. We can’t let that happen. That’s why COVID-19 Freeze measures take effect today,” Brown declared on Twitter, including a list of all the types of businesses and services that would be affected.

According to Brown’s emergency order, violators could face 30 days in jail, a $1,250 fine, or both.

“The Oregon State Police will be working with local law enforcement to enforce the Governor’s orders, in the same way local law enforcement officers respond to noise complaints for loud parties, for example, and issue citations,” Brown spokesman Charles Boyle said in an email Saturday.

Incoming chairwoman of the Clackamas Board of County Commissioners Tootie Smith (R) stated on Facebook that she would defy Brown’s unconstitutional orders.
Now that you're intellectually ahead, stay physically ahead by visiting our store.

“My family will celebrate Thanksgiving with as many family and friends as I can find,” Smith posted last week in the wake of Brown’s initial announcement.

“I don’t know if there’s going to be a knock at the door,” Smith told The Oregonian. “But I’m going to, in my very private home with my family, continue to celebrate this holiday and Christmas as well.”

Brown isn’t the only Democrat tyrant to impose such authoritarian measures as Thanksgiving approaches.

Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (Mich.) also announced in a press release extremely restrictive measures that would take effect Wednesday, such as only two households allowed to gather indoors at a time, while up to 25 people will be allowed to gather outdoors, suspension of eat-in dining at restaurants and bars, statewide closures of high schools and colleges.

“I know people are tired of living like this, but we have to double down,” Whitmer said Sunday. “We potentially could be looking at the deadliest, most grim days of this virus ahead of us.”

“As hard as it is not seeing [family members] this Thanksgiving, imagine how much harder it would be if you weren’t able to see them for a future holiday ever again,” she added.

Last week, Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot issued similar draconian decrees to take effect Monday against Thanksgiving gatherings in the name of curbing the China Virus, for which she received backlash after bull horning for Joe Biden in front of a crowd of supporters days before.

This isn’t about public health. This about asserting control over the people, isolating them and crushing their spirit just in time for the holidays.
0 3 Read More
11/18/2020 06:31 PM 20 Years in Afghanistan Isn't Long Enough [by airforce]
So says Mitt Romney, who carefully avoided the draft during Vietnam.

Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah thinks that the U.S. needs to keep troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, stating that even after 20 years of a military presence there, “conditions for withdrawal have not been met.”

“The decision to withdraw our troops from Afghanistan, Iraq, and potentially elsewhere should not be based on a U.S. political calendar,” Romney said in a statement. “The Administration has yet to explain why reducing troops in Afghanistan—where conditions for withdrawal have not been met—is a wise decision for our national security interests in the region.”

Decisions regarding troops levels in Afghanistan and Iraq should be based on our national security interests, not politics. The Administration should reverse proposed troop withdrawals.

— Senator Mitt Romney (@SenatorRomney) November 17, 2020

Romney’s statement follows the Pentagon’s announcement to withdraw thousands of U.S. troops from the Middle East, specifically Afghanistan and Iraq, by the beginning of 2021.

Previously, President Donald J. Trump announced that he wanted all of the troops stationed in Afghanistan to come back to the U.S. by Christmas.

“We should have the small remaining number of our BRAVE Men and Women serving in Afghanistan home by Christmas!” he wrote.

We should have the small remaining number of our BRAVE Men and Women serving in Afghanistan home by Christmas!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 7, 2020

Despite the thousands of troops stationed in the area for the last two decades, Romney says that removing them would pose a threat to national security.

“Similarly, with continued security challenges in the Middle East, an arbitrary withdrawal from Iraq risks alienating our allies and emboldening our enemies,” he added. “At a time when our adversaries are looking for every opportunity to exploit our weaknesses, the Administration should reconsider and reverse this politically-motivated decision and avoid worsening our national security challenges.”

Romney, who is historically pro-war, has never served in the military, even avoiding the draft for the Vietnam War by claiming exemption as an undergraduate student at Stanford University, a Mormon missionary, and then an undergraduate student again at Brigham Young University.

The senator also came under fire in 2007 during his presidential campaign for saying that his sons, none of whom joined the military either, were serving their country by “helping me get elected.”

“The good news is that we have a volunteer Army and that’s the way we’re going to keep it,” Romney said. “My sons are all adults and they’ve made decisions about their careers and they’ve chosen not to serve in the military and active duty and I respect their decision in that regard.”

“One of the ways my sons are showing support for our nation is helping me get elected because they think I’d be a great president,” he added.

Mitt Romney, who compared his sons’ political campaign work to military service, claims it’s in our national security interest to keep sending American sons and fathers to die in Afghanistan for a 20-year-old war w/ no victory definition or exit strategy.

— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) November 18, 2020

Onward and upward,
1 2 Read More
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 5 guests, and 0 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
cerven1us, Cobalt, Bamapatriot, SinisterEagle, BlazerBear65
3826 Registered Users
Forum Statistics
Most Online69
Dec 14th, 2018
Popular Topics(Views)
6,468 We're Back!
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30
Top Posters(All Time)
airforce 21,003
ConSigCor 18,211
Doktor_Jeep 7,005
SBL 4,317
Lord Vader 3,823
Imagrunt 3,469
tire iron 3,426
The Greywolf 3,150
Hawk45 2,968
Shout Box
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
©All information posted on this site is the private property of the individual author and and may not be reproduced without permission. © 2001-2020 All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software