Randy
All across this nation men and women are awakening to find, like I did, that our perceived heroes are in reality our foes. This has created both an anger at the lies, and a suspicion of the other guy across the street.
There are a few movements that if they get off the ground will need the Militia as a protector until they have enough momentum to sustain themselves.
One group is the The Republic for the united States of America (http://www.republicoftheunitedstates.org/) who have about the most complete organization in most of the 50 states.
Another is the Assemblies (http://www.assemblypost.com) who also use a group called "Rangers" and where they have established themselves seem to be quiet successful in holding the Feds at bay.
In Alaska Stewart has merged both militia and committees of safety in a very successful movement. (Strange that a State with Governor "Sarah Palin, our savior, needs a militia?)
The civilian counterpart in freedom is the missing link in America's rebirth. Soldiers are great leaders and defenders, but most good ones can't say what makes that warm cozy feeling in civilians. The movements as Dr. Edwin Vieira states, need the Militias to protect their leaders and the people from the government until the organization is complete.
Every Militia group in the united States should be supporting one or more of these civilian groups until the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Corp is finished and returned to the path of the Constitution, and the UNITED NATIONS Corp is convinced that intervention will become very expensive and not worth the effort.
Or we can continue buying weapons and BDU's and arguing on these boards about which SPLC article is worse.