AWRM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Three states OK stricter gun laws in Election Day referenda #159880
11/11/2016 09:38 AM
11/11/2016 09:38 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,958
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content OP
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content OP
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,958
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
Three states OK stricter gun laws in Election Day referenda

Jon Street November 9, 2016

Three states voted Tuesday to expand gun control measures, while one defeated an attempt to restrict Second Amendment rights.

California, Washington and Nevada all approved stricter gun laws, from banning certain ammunition sales to requiring background checks on private gun sales. Maine shot down an attempt to require background checks on private purchases.

The California measure makes it illegal to possess ammunition magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. It also requires background checks for anyone purchasing ammunition and lays out a process by which convicted felons’ firearms are seized.

“It was a repudiation of the National Rifle Assn. and the gun lobby. They lost badly,” California Lt. Gov. Gavin Newsom told the Los Angeles Times. “It’s a very important initiative because I think it’s the beginning of a national debate on relinquishment and ammunition background checks that will I think will have a very significant impact on reducing gun violence in this country.”

In Washington, voters approved a measure that allows police and family to petition a judge to restrict gun ownership of people thought to be a danger to themselves or to others, the Seattle Times reported.

Nevada voters OK’d expanding background checks for all private gun sales and transfers.

Joe Duffy, who headed the campaign in support of Nevada’s proposed new gun laws told the Las Vegas Review Journal that the newly approved law is a “common-sense measure that can save lives while respecting the rights of law-abiding gun owners.”

Maine voters rejected a measure similar to the one in Nevada. Gun rights advocates celebrated their victory, calling it a “great night for the people of Maine.”

“With their freedoms in question and liberties at stake, they embraced the rights recognized in our constitution and said no to the poorly written, unenforceable mandates of the Question 3 ballot initiative,” Chris Cox, executive director of the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, told the Portland Press Herald.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Three states OK stricter gun laws in Election Day referenda #159881
11/11/2016 10:49 AM
11/11/2016 10:49 AM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,705
Western States
Breacher Offline
Moderator
Breacher  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 6,705
Western States
Yeah, they reduce gun violence and trade it for their constituency crowd stomping anybody they deem politically incorrect.

It's all those highly trained martial artists who don't want to lose their advantage when they bully people and the police who want the upper hand in distributing protection services in order to create an artificial dependence on them for protection.

It's that this third world stuff where you are not allowed to own your own gun, but if you can afford it, you can pay for an armed rent a cop.

I hate to say I would agree, but look at the constituency in those areas. Yeah you want your own guns, but do you really want all those little shits able to just get Uzis from a vending machine?

Governor Bown gets it to some degree. He deliberately vetoed the ban on 80% lowers.


Life liberty, and the pursuit of those who threaten them.

Trump: not the president America needs, but the president America deserves.

.
©>
©All information posted on this site is the private property of the individual author and AWRM.net and may not be reproduced without permission. © 2001-2020 AWRM.net All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1