FREE THE VACCINE W/ ALLIE FRENCH AND DR. LEE MERRITT
November 9, 2020
BY CLYDE LEWIS
Before Halloween, I was contemplating the balance I would give to all of the major news stories and the paranormal stories I do. It was difficult because there was so much going on that I am sure that in the process I was overlooking something that certainly needed attention.
Around the time we called out Dark Winter, long before Joe Biden acknowledged it – that plan was underway for a psychological operation that both political parties were aware of and Donald Trump confirmed there would be a viable vaccine by Election Day.
However, as we reported Friday, there was a table top asymmetrical warfare exercise that was carried out six months ago where a fictitious election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump would wind up with Biden beating Trump with a called electoral vote.
The war game plan was carried out by the Transition Integrity Project.
The scenario predicted a narrow Biden victory in the Electoral College: 278 to 260. The group that represented Team Trump were told not to concede the election under no circumstances.
They were told that they had to use whatever means necessary to secure the 10 electoral college votes to swing the election. They were asked to focus on three of the swing states that in this particular scenario Biden had gained— Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania because, in all three, Republicans control both branches of the legislature. Normally, the governor certifies the election results, and in all three states the governor is a Democrat. But there is nothing to prevent the legislature from certifying a different election outcome.
In the mock transition scenario, the Republican Party bombarded the airwaves with claims of electoral fraud and insisted that Trump had been cheated of victory. The GOP filed suit to prevent the certification of the results. Attorney General William P. Barr, supported this effort in this mock exercise by claiming to have detected efforts by Chinese intelligence, Antifa terrorists and other enemies of the people to steal the election.
The goal was to tie up the proceedings in the courts, initially at the state level, and quickly force the Republican-dominated Supreme Court to intervene.
While this was going on, chaos reigned in the streets, with pro- and anti-Trump activists mobilizing massive protests and violence erupting. Democrats believed that mass protests could force the government to respect the election outcome. But the team representing Trump, calculated that such chaos would help persuade the Supreme Court to intervene to shut down the dispute. In 2000, even two of the more moderate conservative justices — Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony M. Kennedy voted to end Florida’s recount and hand the election to George W. Bush.
The question is: was it all that fictitious or was it part of a psychological operation and has it gone real time under the auspices of Dark Winter?
It would appear that a mock exercise has gone real world and that a massive psy-op is now being offered and the media and the people are being led into it without a doubt because of the new found feelings of unity that we are told the country is feeling.
However, actor James Woods tweeted today the sentiments of many conservative voters when he stated: the country has been pummeled by the left like a battered wife and now they are telling her to put on her sunglasses to hide her black eye and be a good little girl.
If the Transition Integrity Project has gone real world, then this is massive psy-op that has been launched across the world because no one is even thinking that the existing and forthcoming litigation from the Trump team might change the final tally in key battleground states, and in turn influence how the Electoral College votes in the middle of next month, since it’s this institution – not the media or the popular vote – which legally decides the presidency, as per the Constitution.
With the psy-op reaching its crescendo towards what might ultimately end up being Trump’s official capitulation (although no such concession on his side is constitutionally required), the question on his supporters’ minds is whether or not they should recognize the contentious results even if the Electoral College certifies them. That’s a personal decision that every person must make for themselves, though it should be said that everyone should abide by the law and not burn, loot, riot, and even murder in rare instances like the “deep state’s” de-facto street militias of Antifa and “Black Lives Matter” have done for nearly the past half-year with practical impunity when expressing their rage against the system. Nevertheless, consent is purely personal and doesn’t have to be given even if one goes through the motions of abiding by the certified outcome in order to avoid the possible consequences of being placed on the “enemies list” that some of the dictatorial Democrats are currently compiling.
Of course, the enemies list was not part of the mock exercise but it was to be expected – Dark Winter means so many things to the Deep State operatives that are behind it.
After we reported that the election would be in favor of Joe Biden as per the exercise there were a few other things that were also in play and that was how COVID-19 would also be used to create even more mistrust of the people as there would be talk of an overnight miracle cure or vaccine that would certainly tune the tide for the election.
Today, Pfizer announced that its COVID-19 vaccine may be a remarkable 90% effective, based on early and incomplete test results that nevertheless brought a big burst of optimism to a world desperate for the means to finally bring the catastrophic outbreak under control.
The announcement came less than a week after an election seen as a referendum on President Donald Trump’s handling of the virus. Trump had announced that the vaccine would arrive before the election and of course it landed 48 hours after Joe Biden was declared the winner of the election by the mainstream media—the same media both Fox News and CNN , MSNBC, to flat out censor any and all talk about voter fraud,claiming that Trump has no evidence.
President-elect Joe Biden has warned the United States is still ‘facing a very dark winter’ and says a COVID-19 vaccine likely won’t be available for months despite the news today from Pfizer that its jab may be 90 percent effective.
Pfizer, which developed a vaccine with German drugmaker BioNTech, are the first to release successful data based on an interim analysis from a large-scale coronavirus vaccine clinical trial.
Just hours after Pfizer’s announcement, Biden made remarks from Wilmington, Delaware saying that a coronavirus vaccine approval process must be guided by science so the public can have confidence it is safe and effective.
Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. government’s top infectious-disease expert, said the results suggesting 90% effectiveness are “just extraordinary,” adding: “Not very many people expected it would be as high as that.”
President Trump, who had suggested repeatedly during the presidential campaign that a vaccine could be ready by Election Day, tweeted: “STOCK MARKET UP BIG, VACCINE COMING SOON. REPORT 90% EFFECTIVE. SUCH GREAT NEWS!”
Donald Trump Jr. tweeted: “The timing of this is pretty amazing. Nothing nefarious about the timing of this at all right?”
Pfizer has insisted that its work is not influenced by politics and that it was “moving at the speed of science.” Denying that they were not part of the President’s Operation Warp Speed program.
Pfizer said its only involvement in Operation Warp Speed is that those doses are part of the administration’s goal to have 300 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines ready sometime next year.
Even though Pfizer denies it is playing politics, it is obvious that politics are at play here otherwise the vaccine would be distributed without delay, however, I am sure it will be held until the Electoral College votes in December and the transition of power happens between Biden and Trump.
So we will not see this vaccine until February at the latest.
This raises the question of whether using a virus as a weapon against a group of people is tantamount to terrorism.
The “Deep State’s” mainstream media proxies launched a massive psy-op against the world by stoking fear about the virus, encouraging the continues lockdowns, blaming the sitting President for the fatalities and then by coincidence produce a vaccine with 90 percent effectiveness just three days after the announcement of a possible new president taking the White House.
It is also evident that the psy-op includes the declaring Biden the President-Elect despite the outcome still being litigated and the Electoral College not yet having cast their ballots for the Democratic candidate. Many average folks and foreign governments anticipating either oit of innocent ignorance or willing hypocritical complicity with this take over due to their political sympathies for President Trump’s opponents. In any case, just like “The Connection Between World War Covid & Psychological Processes Is Seriously Concerning”, so too should the widespread manipulation of global perceptions be equally concerning for all those are aware of what’s happening.
Last month, an international group of lawyers claimed that they are preparing to sue the World Health Organization over damage inflicted on large parts of the population by the coronavirus lockdowns.
A lawyer named Dr. Reiner Fuellmich who is one of four members of the German Coronavirus Investigative Committee Claims that he along with many lawyers are taking evidence and listening to testimonies of large numbers of international scientists in order to ‘find answers to questions that more and more people are asking worldwide about the Coronavirus’.
This corona crisis he says must be renamed a corona scandal and those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil damages. He proceeds to explain how and where an international network of lawyers will argue this ‘biggest tort case ever’. There are three main questions to answer: briefly, the first – is there a corona pandemic or a PCR testing pandemic? The second – is lockdown (social distancing, masks and so on) a protective measure or there to create panic and fear? third – was were governments massively lobbied by the chief protagonists of the corona pandemic?
Meanwhile, Biden still contends that Dark Winter has arrived and that 200,000 more people will die if we do not wear masks and social distance – you may recall that he gave the same quote in August claiming if people would just wear their masks for three more months they would save nearly 200,000 lives.
Now the lives the he said would be saved are the same that will die if we don’t comply.
If they’re not freeing the vaccine and continue this psy-op this can be considered psychological terrorism.
He stated: “We are Americans and our country is under threat.”
COVID-19. Biden, Trump. Social Justice. War. Human Rights. Economics. Whatever the issue, it seems that every day we are being told we must adopt a particular position. And to do so “or else”. Under incredible pressure to be in the right and to feel good about ourselves, we are bombarded with “ways to think” that are quite often delivered by overt propaganda, but that are also, perhaps more than we realize, covert and not aware to us consciously.
None of this is coincidence, none of it is accidental, but it is sinister. If things continue as they have been, and this lockdown remains in place, whether fully or partially, the anticipation of this “dark winter” will be on the minds of most all Americans, especially if it is continually used as the threat of things to come.
With that in the minds of the people, they will be expecting the worst, and will probably get exactly what they expect; an extension of lockdown or a restart happening sometime either during Thanksgiving or Christmas of 2020 where they will warn families not to gather at these times.
The cooler climate will keep COVID-19 spreading – we are hearing now that it is at its fever pitch – and yet they are sitting on that vaccine. The other dear is that there is no guarantees about the harmful side effects of a vaccine that has been rushed to production.
There will be lockdowns – government pauses extended emergencies and tax collecting during the winter.
Contact tracing of individuals will become more and more evident at public gatherings and in the Shopping Malls this winter. Be advised that there is also plans for door to door visits form Health security officials during the harsh winter that will of course conduct welfare checks, provide food and services if needed and they may discourage family gatherings for the holidays.
The government announced that a contract for $138 million was been issued to fund production of 500 million pre-filled COVID-19 vaccine “injection devices,” this was before any vaccine was available or even in the test range.
Does this sound like a well-planned political maneuver?
As any should be able to see, this is a complex, but easily identifiable plot that is coming to fruition very quickly and with little resistance. It is planned down to the last detail, just as were all the practice runs that were acted out in the past.
COVID-19 is real and it’s very deadly for at-risk members of the population, but the historically unprecedented full-spectrum paradigm-changing processes catalyzed by the world’s uncoordinated attempt to contain it have been greatly influenced by psychological processes that continue to be taken advantage of in order to politically exploit the pandemic, the observation of which should be seriously concerning for everyone.
Every country of economic significance seems to be scrambling to prepare themselves for what their leaders appear to sincerely believe is the inevitable “Fourth Industrial Revolution”, or “Great Reset,” though they’re going about it in different ways.
The expectation of a Marxist post-scarcity economy where the automation and digitalization of many jobs will lead to the large-scale replacement of many workers with AI is predicted to result in greater individual dependence on the government, which is preemptively being forced upon many of them through lockdowns and subsequent economic stimulus packages that might ultimately lead to a policy of so-called “universal basic income”.
In order to enforce compliance, the authorities over-exaggerate the lethality of COVID-19 so as to keep the population imprisoned in the homes out of fear, while those who dare to venture outside are forced to wear masks even though their effectiveness in preventing infection isn’t perfect like they’ve been officially portrayed. Masks also serve the purpose of psychologically reassuring the population that they can survive the pandemic.
It is Security Theater – it is the outside compliance to the psychological operation. It is your protection from what is planned for Dark Winter.
"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
"Next Crisis Bigger than COVID" - Power Grid/Finance Down
“The Great Reset” Trends on Twitter After Justin Trudeau Says Corona Pandemic Has Provided “Opportunity”
By Paul Joseph Watson | INFOWARS.COM Monday, November 16, 2020
“The Great Reset” began trending on Twitter after Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said the coronavirus pandemic had provided an “opportunity for a reset.”
Trudeau made the comments during a United Nations video conference back in September, but they are only just receiving attention.
“Building back better means getting support to the most vulnerable while maintaining our momentum on reaching the 2030 agenda for sustainable development and the SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals)” said Trudeau.
“This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset – this is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to re-imagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and climate change,” he added.
Many Twitter users asserted that “The Great Reset” was a “conspiracy theory” despite the fact that it’s an agenda openly espoused by the World Economic Forum and numerous other financial elitists and NGOs.
As former Australian Senator Cory Bernardi outlined, “The Great Reset” is merely a re-branding of the move towards the centralization of power and a New World Order.
Bernardi noted how the coronavirus pandemic had facilitated the opportunity to impose a very similar crackdown that technocrats had previously sought to justify under the banner of climate change, namely, shutting down economies, lowering fuel consumption and airline travel as well as curtailing civil liberties and freedom of movement.
As we previously highlighted, in promoting “The Great Reset,” World Economic Forum globalist Klaus Schwab asserted that the world will “never” return to normal, despite him admitting that coronavirus “doesn’t pose a new existential threat.”
Watch the interview below with James Delingpole for a full breakdown of what “The Great Reset” actually represents.
Klaus Schwab: Great Reset Will “Lead to a Fusion of Our Physical, Digital and Biological Identity”
By Paul Joseph Watson | INFOWARS.COM Monday, November 16, 2020
Globalist Klaus Schwab made it clear that transhumanism is an integral part of “The Great Reset” when he said that the fourth industrial revolution would “lead to a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity,” which in his book he clarifies is implantable microchips that can read your thoughts.
As we highlighted earlier, “The Great Reset” is attracting a deluge of fresh attention in the aftermath of the coronavirus pandemic, which Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said was an “opportunity for a reset.”
The agenda is primarily based around dismantling the current capitalist system in favor of greater centralized technocrat rule which will lead to lower living standards, less fuel consumption, fewer civil liberties and the accelerated automation of jobs.
However, another key aspect to “The Great Reset,” or the “fourth industrial revolution” as Schwab calls it, is merging man with machine.
“What the fourth industrial revolution will lead to is a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity,” Schwab told the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
Schwab went on to explain how his book, ‘Shaping the Future of The Fourth Industrial Revolution’, was particularly popular in China, South Korea and Japan, with the South Korean military alone purchasing 16,000 copies.
In the book, Schwab explains with excitement how upcoming technology will allow authorities to “intrude into the hitherto private space of our minds, reading our thoughts and influencing our behavior.”
He goes on to predict that this will provide an incentive for law enforcement to implement Minority Report-style pre-crime programs.
“As capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people’s brains will increase,” writes Schwab. “Even crossing a national border might one day involve a detailed brain scan to assess an individual’s security risk.”
Schwab also waxes lyrical about the transhumanist utopian dream shared by all elitists which will ultimately lead to the creation of human cyborgs.
“Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies will not stop at becoming part of the physical world around us—they will become part of us,” writes Schwab.
“Indeed, some of us already feel that our smartphones have become an extension of ourselves. Today’s external devices—from wearable computers to virtual reality headsets—will almost certainly become implantable in our bodies and brains.”
Schwab also openly endorses something the media still claims is solely a domain of discussion for conspiracy theorists, namely “active implantable microchips that break the skin barrier of our bodies.”
The globalist hails the arrival of “implanted devices (that) will likely also help to communicate thoughts normally expressed verbally through a ‘built-in’ smartphone, and potentially unexpressed thoughts or moods by reading brain waves and other signals.”
So in other words, the “fusion of our physical, digital and biological identity” relates to the transhumanist singularity and a future where people have their every movement tracked and every thought read by an implantable microchip.
It isn’t a “conspiracy theory” when they’re openly telling you what they want to do.
"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
The annual meeting of the Word Economic Forum will be held the week of January 25, 2021 in Davos Switzerland.
Here is a short video of what the globalists are working towards.
Here is Laura Ingraham discussion on the topic November 13, 2020.
If former VP Biden does win the Presidential election, here comes the New World Order to your AO. Are you, your family, and your friends ready? Ready to comply or go off to a education camps?
Take time to read Matt Bracken’s article today titled, WHAT THE PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST LIBERALS HAVE IN STORE FOR CONSERVATIVES: A MASTER COURSE IN GOVERNMENT-SPONSORED GENOCIDE. It is eye opening.
Remember, once you put your hands behind your back, you will have no recourse.
"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
About twenty-four hundred years ago, the Greek philosopher Plato came up with the idea constructing the state and society according to an elaborate plan. Plato wanted “wise men” (philosophers) at the helm of the government, but he made it also clear that his kind of state would need a transformation of the humans. In modern times, the promoters of the omnipotent state want to substitute Plato’s philosopher with the expert and create the new man through eugenics, which is now called transhumanism. The United Nations and its various suborganizations play a pivotal role in this project which has reached its present stage in the project of the Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset.
The Struggle for a World Government
The Great Reset did not come from nowhere. The first modern attempts to create a global institution with a governmental function was launched by the government of Woodrow Wilson who acted as US president from 1913 to 1921. Under the inspiration of Colonel Mandell House, the president’s prime advisor and best friend, Wilson wanted to establish a world forum for the period after World War I. Yet the plan of American participation in the League of Nations failed and the drive toward internationalism and establishing a new world order receded during the Roaring Twenties.
A new move toward managing a society like an organization, however, came during the Great Depression. Franklin Delano Roosevelt did not let the crisis go by without driving the agenda forward with his “New Deal.” FDR was especially interested in the special executive privileges that came with the Second World War. Resistance was almost nil when he moved forward to lay the groundwork for a new League of Nations, which was now to be named the United Nations.
Under the leadership of Stalin, Churchill, and Roosevelt, twenty-six nations agreed in January 1942 to the initiative of establishing a United Nations Organization (UNO), which came into existence on October 24, 1945. Since its inception, the United Nations and its branches, such as the World Bank Group and the World Health Organization (WHO), have prepared the countries of the world to comply with the goals that were announced at its foundation.
Yet the unctuous pronouncements of promoting “international peace and security,” “developing friendly relations among nations,” and working for “social progress, better living standards, and human rights” hides the agenda of establishing a world government with executive powers whose task would not be promoting liberty and free markets but greater interventionism and control through cultural and scientific organizations. This became clear with the creation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) in 1945.
Eugenics
After the foundation of UNESCO in 1945, the English evolutionary biologist, eugenicist, and declared globalist Julian Huxley (the brother of Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World) became its first director.
At the launch of the organization, Huxley called for a “scientific world humanism, global in extent” (p. 8) and asked to manipulate human evolution to a “desirable” end. Referring to dialectical materialism as “the first radical attempt at an evolutionary philosophy” (p. 11), the director of UNESCO laments that the Marxist approach to changing society was bound to fail because of its lack of an indispensable “biological component.”
With these ideas, Julian Huxley was in respectable company. Since the late nineteenth century, the call for the genetic betterment of the human race through eugenics has been gaining many prominent followers. John Maynard Keynes, for example, held the promotion of eugenics and population control as one the most important social questions and a crucial area of research.
Keynes was not alone. The list of advocates of breeding the human race for its own betterment is quite large and impressive. These “illiberal reformers” include, among many other well-known names, the writers H.G. Wells and G.B. Shaw, US president Theodore Roosevelt, and British prime minister Winston Churchill as well as the economist Irving Fisher and the family-planning pioneers Margaret Sanger and Bill Gates Sr., the father of Bill Gates, Microsoft cofounder and head of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
In his discourse at the foundation of the UNESCO, Julian Huxley was quite specific about the goals and methods of this institution. To achieve the desired “evolutionary progress” of mankind, the first step must be to stress “the ultimate need for world political unity and familiarize all peoples with the implications of the transfer of full sovereignty from separate nations to a world organization.”
Furthermore, the institution must consider the tradeoff between the “importance of quality as against quantity” (p. 14), which means it must take into account that there is, “an optimum range of size for every human organization as for every type of organism” (p. 15). The educational, scientific, and cultural organization of the UN should give special attention to “unity-in-variety of the world’s art and culture as well as the promotion of one single pool of scientific knowledge” (p 17).
Huxley makes it clear that human diversity is not for all. Variety for “weaklings, fools, and moral deficients…cannot but be bad,” and because a “considerable percentage of the population is not capable of profiting from higher education” and also a “considerable percentage of young men” suffer from “physical weakness or mental instability” and “these grounds are often genetic in origin” (p. 20), these groups must be excluded from the efforts of advancing human progress.
In his discourse, Huxley diagnosed that at the time of his writing the “indirect effect of civilization” is rather “dysgenic instead of eugenic” and that “in any case, it seems likely that the deadweight of genetic stupidity, physical weakness, mental instability, and disease-proneness, which already exist in the human species, will prove too great a burden for real progress to be achieved” (p. 21). After all, it is “essential that eugenics should be brought entirely within the borders of science, for as already indicated, in the not very remote future the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent; and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics” (pp. 37–38).
Use of the Climate Threat
The next decisive step toward the global economic transformation was taken with the first report of the Club of Rome. In 1968, the Club of Rome was initiated at the Rockefeller estate Bellagio in Italy. Its first report was published in 1972 under the title “The Limits to Growth.”
The president emeritus of the Club of Rome, Alexander King, and the secretary of the club, General Bertrand Schneider, inform in their Report of the Council of the Club of Rome that when the members of the club were in search of identifying a new enemy, they listed pollution, global warming, water shortages, and famines as the most opportune items to be blamed on humanity with the implication that humanity itself must be reduced to keep these threats in check.
Since the 1990s, several comprehensive initiatives toward a global system of control have been undertaken by the United Nations with Agenda 2021 and Agenda 2030. The 2030 Agenda was adopted by all United Nations member states in 2015. It launched its blueprint for global change with the call to achieve seventeen sustainable development goals (SDGs). The key concept is “sustainable development” that includes population control as a crucial instrument.
Saving the earth has become the slogan of green policy warriors. Since the 1970s, the horror scenario of global warming has been a useful tool in their hands to gain political influence and finally rule over public discourse. In the meanwhile, these anticapitalist groups have obtained a dominant influence in the media, the educational and judicial systems, and have become major players in the political arena.
In many countries, particularly in Europe, the so-called green parties have become a pivotal factor in the political system. Many of the representatives are quite open in their demands to make society and the economy compatible with high ecological standards that require a profound reset of the present system.
In 1945, Huxley (p. 21) noted that it is too early to propose outright a eugenic depopulation program but advised that it will be important for the organization “to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
Huxley’s caution is no longer necessary. In the meantime, the branches of the United Nations have gained such a level of power that even originally minor UN suborganizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) have been enabled to command individual governments around the world to obey their orders. The WHO and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)—whose conditionality for loans has changed from fiscal restraint to the degree to which a country follows the rules set by the WHO—have become the supreme tandem to work toward establishing the new world order.
As Julian Huxley pointed out in his discourse in 1945, it is the task of the United Nations to do away with economic freedom, because “laisser-faire and capitalist economic systems” have “created a great deal of ugliness” (p. 38). The time has come to work toward the emergence “of a single world culture” (p. 61). This must be done with the explicit help of the mass media and the educational systems.
Conclusion
With the foundation of the United Nations and its suborganizations, the drive to advance the programs of eugenics and transhumanism took a big step forward. Together with the activities of the Club of Rome, they have stage to initiate the great reset that is going on currently. With the pronouncement of a pandemic, the goal of comprehensive government control of the economy and society has taken another leap toward transforming the economy and society. Freedom faces a new enemy. The tyranny comes under the disguise of expert rule and benevolent dictatorship. The new rulers do not justify their right to dominance because of divine providence but now claim the right to rule the people in the name of universal health and safety based on presumed scientific evidence.
By Michael Snyder | Economic Collapse Friday, November 20, 2020
The Internet sure has been buzzing about “the Great Reset” lately. That term has been trending on Facebook and Twitter, and the New York Times even published an article dismissing it as a “conspiracy theory”.
But it is definitely no conspiracy theory. I was determined to get to the bottom of this whole thing, and I am going to share the facts that the New York Times either could not find or refused to share.
It turns out that “the Great Reset” is actually an initiative that was started by the World Economic Forum that is designed to get “global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis”. The following comes directly from the official website of the World Economic Forum…
There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative.
Harrison reacts to the confusing New York Times headline declaring that the Great Reset is not real, while Time magazine has a cover based on the Great Reset.
So the New York Times put out fake news when they told all of us that “the Great Reset” is just a “conspiracy theory”, and they owe all of us a major apology.
According to the World Economic Forum, “the Great Reset” is a “unique window of opportunity” for global leaders to shape “the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons”… Now that you're intellectually ahead, stay physically ahead by visiting our store.
As we enter a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons. Drawing from the vision and vast expertise of the leaders engaged across the Forum’s communities, the Great Reset initiative has a set of dimensions to build a new social contract that honours the dignity of every human being.
In other words, “the Great Reset” is essentially just an updated blueprint for a New World Order.
The man behind “the Great Reset” is named Klaus Schwab. He is the founder and executive chairman of the World Economic Forum, and elsewhere on the official site of the WEF there is an article by Schwab entitled “Now is the time for a ‘great reset’”. The following is an excerpt from that article…
To achieve a better outcome, the world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.
He is very open about the fact that he wants to “revamp all aspects of our societies and economies”. That means that all aspects of human activity would fall under his plan.
But in particular, he very much wants a “Great Reset” of capitalism.
That definitely sets off alarm bells. When people start talking about dramatic changes to capitalism, usually what they mean is that we should move even more in the direction of socialism.
According to Schwab, there are three main components to “the Great Reset”. The first involves reforming our economic systems so that they will “promote more equitable outcomes”…
Moreover, governments should implement long-overdue reforms that promote more equitable outcomes. Depending on the country, these may include changes to wealth taxes, the withdrawal of fossil-fuel subsidies, and new rules governing intellectual property, trade, and competition.
Unfortunately, I think that he means the exact same thing that Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez means when she talks about “more equitable outcomes”.
Secondly, Schwab says that one of the main components of “the Great Reset” would involve massive government investments in “green” urban infrastructure and other similar projects…
The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability. Here, the large-scale spending programs that many governments are implementing represent a major opportunity for progress. The European Commission, for one, has unveiled plans for a €750 billion ($826 billion) recovery fund. The US, China, and Japan also have ambitious economic-stimulus plans.
Rather than using these funds, as well as investments from private entities and pension funds, to fill cracks in the old system, we should use them to create a new one that is more resilient, equitable, and sustainable in the long run. This means, for example, building “green” urban infrastructure and creating incentives for industries to improve their track record on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) metrics.
Doesn’t that sound a whole lot like the “Green New Deal” that many on the left have been pushing here in the United States?
Thirdly, Schwab envisions applying the “innovations” that we have witnessed during the COVID pandemic as a model for “every sector” of society…
The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges. During the COVID-19 crisis, companies, universities, and others have joined forces to develop diagnostics, therapeutics, and possible vaccines; establish testing centers; create mechanisms for tracing infections; and deliver telemedicine. Imagine what could be possible if similar concerted efforts were made in every sector.
In other words, Schwab thinks that the global response to the COVID pandemic can be a blueprint for governing every area of our lives moving forward.
Doesn’t that sound just wonderful?
Of course in order for the globalists to get the United States on board with this “Great Reset”, they will need to get Donald Trump out of the way first, and they think that they are very close to achieving that goal.
The globalists envision a “sustainable” future in which all forms of human activity are very closely monitored and controlled for “the good of the planet”. They are entirely convinced that a global system in which all the nations of the world are increasingly integrated is what is best for humanity, but those of us that are resisting the globalists understand that a one world system will inevitably evolve into a complete and utter global nightmare.
Globalist publications such as the New York Times will continue to try to convince all of us that plans such as “the Great Reset” do not even exist, even as globalist organizations such as the World Economic Forum are publicly announcing their plans right out in the open.
In times like these, it is absolutely imperative to think for yourself, because deception is everywhere and those that tell the truth are often greatly ridiculed.
"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
World Economic Forum-Endorsed ‘Great Reset’ Seeks to Eliminate Currency, Private Property
By Frank Salvato | National File Saturday, November 21, 2020
With the results of the 2020 General Election soon to be discovered, the next great threat on the horizon – aside from losing the Republic to Democratic Socialism forever, is “The Great Reset.” It will impact everyone on the planet and be the declaration that Big Brother is here to stay.
Global political elitists, like European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and failed Democrat presidential candidate and former Secretary of State John Kerry, are positioning themselves to use Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden as the driver of the World Economic Forum’s “The Great Reset” mission.
The Great Reset seeks to execute an intrusive and wholesale transformation of the world’s economy and the economic system we have known since the beginning of time. It seeks to radically alter the world’s economy by: abolishing money in deference to digital currency, which the government would be able to adjust and control; eliminating all private property, and greatly reducing the potency of democracy for the sake of a “New World Order.”
In a panel discussion at the World Economic Forum, Kerry said Biden is ready to not only rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement – which would literally eliminate more than a million jobs in the US – but be the driver for the “Great Reset” whereby unelected global bureaucrats would literally take control of the sovereign governments of the world.
“The notion of a reset is more important than ever before,” Kerry said. “I personally believe…we’re at the dawn of an extremely exciting time.”
Kerry reiterated what Biden has already said in so many stump speeches: The first thing he would do as President would be to rejoining the job-killing Paris Climate Agreement. But Kerry said, bluntly, that act was not enough.
“I know Joe Biden believes this. It’s not enough just to rejoin [the Paris Climate Agreement] for the United States. It’s not enough for us to do just the minimum of what [the agreement] requires,” Kerry said. “The Biden administration will focus on every sector of the American economy. There will be a 2035 goal to achieve net neutrality with respect to power and production…we’re ready to come back in and help to lead and raise the ambition in Glasgow to accelerate this incredible capacity for a transformation in the private sector.”
Look sharp by wearing exclusive gear found only at our store.
A critical part of new Biden-European Commission relationship, according to von der Leyen, includes implementing a new “rulebook for the digital economy and the digital society.”
The titular leader of the Globalist movement, which seeks to undermine the sovereignty of all nations, von der Leyen said:
“So, covering everything from data to infrastructure, but also talking about security and democracy, technology to fair taxation, all of these are topics on the table with digital change. So, ladies and gentlemen, the need for global cooperation and this acceleration of change will both be drivers of the Great Reset. And I see this as an unprecedented opportunity.
“It’s good to have a friend in the White House. We should not forget what kind of strength we can develop…we need a new agenda and of course, we will have to start with the most pressing issue which is COVID-19…the second big topic is climate change, fighting climate change…the third topic is the tech topic.”
The mainstream, in-the-pocket, elitist media will also play a huge role in the Great Reset, von der Leyen suggests. New York Times columnist Ben Smith said the media sees themselves as rule-makers; the anointed class that sets the national agenda.
“I think that you’re seeing the mainstream media institutions become a bit more confident in trying to set the national agenda,” Smith said, “trying to establish priorities that they think are the priorities rather than simply reacting to what’s happening…”
"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
