when I saw you wrote in your first post above, .."Perhaps the unvaccinated will feel safer behind the secured perimeter of a FEMA Camp, or perhaps they’ll just get vaccinated to avoid any such necessity. Coercion is a tool of compliance being wielded increasingly often, and with increasing force"... It looked seemed like you were advocating putting anti-vaxers in FEMA Camps when they refuse to take the so-called vaccination.
You aren't for putting anti-vaxers in FEMA Camps are you?
No. I was stating the adversarial position to demonstrate the traitor’s potential thinking and to illustrate an obscured implication, which was, that our adversaries are utilizing increasingly heavy-handed coercion to exhaust us for the purpose of gaining our submission to vaccination, and may continue to escalate to the very threat of relocation/camps in order to break us and finally achieve compliance.
Perhaps you should be more interested in the information and analysis I’m providing you, and less concerned with attacking someone because of a sentence you think possibly means the author doesn’t pass your litmus test, despite everything else written contradicting the position you think that one sentence means the author advocates for.
Navarro was quoting the leftists. I took his post as a warning about what they "want" to do to the masses.
Yes; appreciated.
