AWRM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150826
03/02/2010 07:23 PM
03/02/2010 07:23 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,924
Tulsa
airforce Online content OP
Administrator
airforce  Online Content OP
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,924
Tulsa
Because, you know, those libertarian groups are dangerous. Why, they want to not boss you around! You should tremble in fear!

According to the SPLC, "an astonishing 363 new Patriot groups appeared in 2009, with the totals going from 149 groups (including 42 militias) to 512 (127 of them militias) - a 244% jump" in 2008.

Who are these "new Patriot groups" we should be so frightened of? Well, the SPLC's roster includes 48 separate listings of a group called "We the People," a non-profit, largely libertarian organization founded by anti-tax activist Robert Schultz.

The report stops short--just barely--of calling the various TEA Parties "extremist groups," but it does note that they "are shot through with rich veins of radical ideas, conspiracy theories and racism."

I don't give the SPLC or the ADL much credit, but it would be wise to read their report. After all, we'll undoubtedly see Janeane Garofalo or some other talking head spouting this nonsense, and it would be wise to have our responses prepared in advance.

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150827
03/03/2010 03:02 AM
03/03/2010 03:02 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,741
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,741
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
The SPLC is a joke on a fishing expedition. They have to keep the masses living in fear so they will continue to donate to Morris Sleaze retirement fund.

I spoke to the State Commander of the Sons of Confederate Veterans a couple of days ago. Seems the SPLC is going after that organization again as well.

SPLC also recently contacted Mike Vanderbough the other day wanting to do an interview about the "3 Percenters". MV told them where to get off.

Anyone who doesn't know what the SPLC is really about should watch the expose currently being broadcast on UPN.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150828
03/03/2010 03:22 AM
03/03/2010 03:22 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 256
Manitoba
R
Red River Ranger Offline
Member
Red River Ranger  Offline
Member
R
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 256
Manitoba
I think he puts the Sons of Confederate Veterans on his list of Neo-Confederate groups because that's what they are: Neo-Confederates. In more than one interview I believe that the SCV have identified themselves as such. The problem with SPLC in this regard is that they see no difference between the Klan and Neo-Confederate groups.

Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150829
03/03/2010 04:03 AM
03/03/2010 04:03 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,924
Tulsa
airforce Online content OP
Administrator
airforce  Online Content OP
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,924
Tulsa
The SPLC would put a box of Cheerios on the list of extremist groups if it would help them raise funds. Their credibility is right around zero.

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150830
03/03/2010 04:10 AM
03/03/2010 04:10 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,741
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,741
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
Quote
Originally posted by Red River Ranger:
I think he puts the Sons of Confederate Veterans on his list of Neo-Confederate groups because that's what they are: Neo-Confederates. In more than one interview I believe that the SCV have identified themselves as such. The problem with SPLC in this regard is that they see no difference between the Klan and Neo-Confederate groups.
Actually the SCV is a Confederate heritage organization. The reason the SPLC hates them is because we honor the memory of our ancestors who had the guts to give the ferral government the finger 150 years ago. And, because we teach all who will listen why they did it and why we might need to do it again.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150831
03/03/2010 08:02 AM
03/03/2010 08:02 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 256
Manitoba
R
Red River Ranger Offline
Member
Red River Ranger  Offline
Member
R
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 256
Manitoba
CSC,

What's the difference between that and a Neo-Confederate group? I was under the impression that they were the same thing. I believe that Trent Lot is part of the SCV, and he identified it as Neo-Confederate. PLease correct me if I'm wrong.

RRR

Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150832
03/03/2010 11:30 AM
03/03/2010 11:30 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,741
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,741
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
RRR,

Look at it this way. You have conservatives and neo conservatives. The two may both claim to be republican but they are NOT the same. The neo-cons are nothing but "republican socialist lite".

Now, within the SCV and numerous other Southron organizations you have Confederates and neo-Cons. To the neo-cons it's all about being in some warm and fuzzy social club and honoring their ancestors. But, these same neocons will then apologize for their ancestors "transgressions" against the union...saying that's all in the past. These neo-cons will pay homage to the Lost Cause (Southron independence) then pledge allegiance to the yankee rag..one nation indivisible and all that crap. The Confederate on the other hand will not apologize and in fact will tell you that there is no such thing as the "Lost" Cause. He still hates the yankee government in Washington just as much if not more so than his ancestors did. And, he would be more than willing to "do it again" at the drop of a hat.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150833
03/03/2010 12:03 PM
03/03/2010 12:03 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,200
NW Central Ohio
W
Wyrm Offline
Member
Wyrm  Offline
Member
W
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,200
NW Central Ohio
Nice to see my group finally made the list. It's only been a couple years and numerous 'reports' and they FINALLY got us on there.


Insert something witty here
Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150834
03/03/2010 12:16 PM
03/03/2010 12:16 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,741
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,741
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
Wyrm, youall must be doing something right. Like they say, if you ain't taking flack, you not over the target.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150835
03/03/2010 12:29 PM
03/03/2010 12:29 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,080
Louisiana
C
Cajunpatriot Offline
NCO Contributor
Cajunpatriot  Offline
NCO Contributor

C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,080
Louisiana
Quote
Originally posted by Red River Ranger:
I think he puts the Sons of Confederate Veterans on his list of Neo-Confederate groups because that's what they are: Neo-Confederates. In more than one interview I believe that the SCV have identified themselves as such. The problem with SPLC in this regard is that they see no difference between the Klan and Neo-Confederate groups.
Good point here. The collectivists and imperialists always try to link the Klan (a modern Northern institution) with the Southern Movement. It is just a smear campaign, no different than linking Anti-tax, Anti-FED, and Pro-liberty activists with domestic terrorists. I would say I am a Civic Southern Nationalist. Love of the Confederacy (which I do) is mostly nostalgia. What ever the new state (even a reconfigured United States) that comes to represent the legitimate liberty aspirations and the Right to Self-Determination of the Southron People will not likely be a New Confederate States of America; even if it is a confederation. If a desire for national self-determination is racism then the UN Charter is a racist document.
Quote
Originally posted by ConSigCor:

The Confederate on the other hand will not apologize and in fact will tell you that there is no such thing as the "Lost" Cause. He still hates the yankee government in Washington just as much if not more so than his ancestors did. And, he would be more than willing to "do it again" at the drop of a hat.
I guess I am sort of a "Confederate," then, since I am more than ready to do it again ;-)


CAJUN PATRIOT
Louisiana
Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150836
03/03/2010 12:31 PM
03/03/2010 12:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,080
Louisiana
C
Cajunpatriot Offline
NCO Contributor
Cajunpatriot  Offline
NCO Contributor

C
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,080
Louisiana
Quote
Originally posted by ConSigCor:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Red River Ranger:
[qb] The reason the SPLC hates them is because we honor the memory of our ancestors who had the guts to give the ferral government the finger 150 years ago. And, because we teach all who will listen why they did it and why we might need to do it again.
Deo Vindice!


CAJUN PATRIOT
Louisiana
Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150837
03/03/2010 01:00 PM
03/03/2010 01:00 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,214
DEACTIVATED
P
ParaSkS-DEACTIVATED Offline
Member
ParaSkS-DEACTIVATED  Offline
Member
P
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,214
DEACTIVATED
Is the website supporting the march mentioned our website AWRM?


It doesn't matter how you start something, or how you do in the middle. It matters how you finish it
Paramilitary SKS
Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150838
03/03/2010 01:34 PM
03/03/2010 01:34 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,151
D 057 Btn 47 FF
T
The Greywolf Offline
Senior Member
The Greywolf  Offline
Senior Member
T
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,151
D 057 Btn 47 FF
Quote
Originally posted by airforce:
The SPLC would put a box of Cheerios on the list of extremist groups if it would help them raise funds. Their credibility is right around zero.

Onward and upward,
airforce
Well honestly Airforce, Those damn Cheerios are all the same color and keep other cereals out of their box. frown

Unlike the our dear Captain Crunch with Crunch berries and who allow all different shades of cererals to co-mengle in the box. laugh


The SPLC has been using the Militia movement for 20 years to get funds, by misinformation and outright lies.

I would never expect anything less from them.

a proud member of the SVC, It's a social club?
Damn and I missed the dances. laugh

To the SPLC putting the SCV on your site is fine, your not from the south, so you wouldn't understand....


I believe in absolute Freedom, as little interference from any government as possible...And I'll fight any man trying to take that away from me.

Jimmy Greywolf
Re: Mark Potok and SPLC Are At It Again #150839
03/03/2010 01:47 PM
03/03/2010 01:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,924
Tulsa
airforce Online content OP
Administrator
airforce  Online Content OP
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,924
Tulsa
Quote
Originally posted by Greywolf:
Well honestly Airforce, Those damn Cheerios are all the same color and keep other cereals out of their box. frown
You know, I never thought about it before, but that must be why I like Froot Loops better. laugh

Onward and upward,
airforce


.
©>
©All information posted on this site is the private property of the individual author and AWRM.net and may not be reproduced without permission. © 2001-2020 AWRM.net All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1