AWRM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153920
01/25/2012 12:03 PM
01/25/2012 12:03 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,752
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content OP
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content OP
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,752
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
DHS Presents Plans To Congress That Will Merge DHS With Local/State Law Enforcement

Fixed link http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/HS-HPSCI-hearing-011812.pdf


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153921
01/25/2012 12:13 PM
01/25/2012 12:13 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Missouri
G
green demon Offline
Junior Member
green demon  Offline
Junior Member
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Missouri
I could not read it. It is saying: Sorry, no content was found at the requested path -
it's possible that you've requested this page in error.

Could you find a new link

Re: DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153922
01/25/2012 01:13 PM
01/25/2012 01:13 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,752
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content OP
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content OP
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,752
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153923
01/25/2012 04:32 PM
01/25/2012 04:32 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Missouri
G
green demon Offline
Junior Member
green demon  Offline
Junior Member
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 27
Missouri
thanks for the link

Re: DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153924
01/26/2012 02:11 AM
01/26/2012 02:11 AM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 729
High Desert
D308cat Offline
Senior Member
D308cat  Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 729
High Desert
Notice how the conversation on the comments degrades into imature vulgar name calling and stupid drival every time on that sight and others. That's another reason why this country is screwed. Mabe they have a point with this thinning the population stuff. (:


PSALM 144:01 Blessed be the LORD my Rock, Who trains my hands for war, And my fingers for battle---
Re: DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153925
01/26/2012 02:20 AM
01/26/2012 02:20 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,535
somewhere-where am I?
J
J. Croft Offline
Member
J. Croft  Offline
Member
J
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,535
somewhere-where am I?
Like this wasn't coming. They were going to gain direct control over local and state police forces sooner or later, so we can begin factoring out ANY support from Oathkeepers-UNLESS you can gain control of the local government and say NO.


Be your own leader

freedomguide.blogspot.com
freedomguide.wordpress.com
youtube.com/user/freedomguide
Re: DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153926
01/26/2012 04:02 AM
01/26/2012 04:02 AM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,253
WI Northwoods
D
drjarhead Offline
Senior Member
drjarhead  Offline
Senior Member
D
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,253
WI Northwoods
Maybe we're looking at this the wrong way.

Maybe it makes for a more target rich environment.

So they want to be Feds?
Two sides to that one.



The War for America
Fight Everywhere
III
Re: DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153927
01/26/2012 05:25 AM
01/26/2012 05:25 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,015
washington
mak9030mag Offline
Senior Member
mak9030mag  Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,015
washington
Once this happens it looks like they will all be the kings army. No more police officers.


Mak
Re: DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153928
01/26/2012 05:28 AM
01/26/2012 05:28 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,752
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content OP
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content OP
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,752
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
Police Preparing for Riots / Martial Law / Economic Collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=OZkAUgo5SF4

Quote
Y'all need to remember you are living UNder emergency doctrine. Be nice if all the hoopra wasn't around 40 years too late to prevent militarization and federalization of state and local police agencies. Let's look:

Expatriated aliens were authorized by a compromised Congress to enter into the State Police agencies under pretense of The Police And Law Enforcement Training And Education Act, Title 1, of the Omnibus Crime Control And Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 USC 3711, et seq.) Now, under the Safe Streets Act (doesn't that sound nice?) pertaining to participants of the State Police Corp Program, it states that participants shall be selected on a competitive basis by each State under regulations prescribed by the director. Under Subpart B it states, "Selection criteria and qualifications: In order to participate in a State Police Corp Program, a participant must: (a) Be a citizen of the United States or be an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States."

Here in the 'state of Washington', participants in the State Police Corp Program and all law enforcement personnel are required to engage in basic law enforcement training which complies with standards adopted by the Washington Criminal Justice Training Commission (see: RCW Chapter 43.101), which directly receives grants, funds and gifts from any source, and specifically the funds appropriated by Congress under the Crime Control Act of 1973 via The Fund and The Bank through their fiscal depository agent, the Federal Reserve, which are charged back against the United States Law Enforcement Assistance Administration Funds (LEAA) which the state is required to make available to "units of local government" pursuant to Section 303(a)(2) of Part C of the Crime Control Act of 1973... and amendatory acts related thereto. The 1973 Law Enforcement Assistance Act (LEAA) stated that the International Organization was, in fact, the police, the prosecutors, public defenders and corrections. It's ALL "international". We'll get to INTERPOL shortly.


That's right, 1968, Safe Streets. Ring a bell for any gun control leftistlation at the Fed level? No coincidence... Fast forward to the 1980's:

In 1988 the Congress of the United States determined that the specific Oath required of all officers of the de jure United States of America (pursuant to Article VI of the Constitution for the United States of America) was obsolete, and that INTERPOL agents, such as the U.S. Marshals were no longer subject to, nor directed to service and labor on behalf of We, the People. See: 28 USC 563, which is the statutory provision for and the oath of office for, a U.S. Marshal. This is referred to as form USM1. This is the Oath of Office for the Director and each United States Marshal, and law enforcement officer in the service of the United States before taking office. The oath or affirmation is to "faithfully execute the duties" of that office. No mention is made of the Constitution. Not one word. And at the bottom statement of the oath, it states: "Prior editions of this form are obsolete and are not to be used."

This was the 1973 edition and was filed on October 6, 1986. Then they came back in 1988 with the changes to be effected pursuant to the Omnibus Drug Initiative Act of 1988, with an amendment called the U.S. Marshal Service Act. This is reflected directly beneath 28 USC 563 where you will find Public Law 101-690, November 18, 1988, which authored the changes in the Oath requirements and essentially repealed the Oath to the Constitution, and also provided for a new Section 564. This new section states:

564. Powers as sheriff.
United States marshals, deputy marshals and such other officials of the Service as may be designated by the Director, in executing the laws of the United States within a State, may exercise the same powers which a sheriff of the State may exercise in executing the laws thereof.

He does not exercise the powers of the Sheriff, only the laws of the United States. To do otherwise would be usurpation of authority. And, if he exercises the power of the Sheriff, such as in doing a foreclosure sale, which they have been known to do, it is outside their authority (as in IRS foreclosures). But they do it, and many other things reserved to the Sheriffs, without so much as notifying them, today.

Looking to the Congressional Record of the U.S. House of Representatives for September 22, 1988, page 7935, is the following quotation:
"Amended Section 563, provides generally that the director U.S. Marshal's and all law enforcement officers of the service must take an oath to faithfully execute the duties of their offices. This section deletes the specific oath prescribed by the current Section 563, certain of the language therein had become obsolete."

Continuing on over to the next page:
"Mr. Morehead: Mr. Chairman, I strongly support the adoption of the U.S. Marshall Service Act as an important and much needed amendment to House Resolution 5210, the Omnibus Drug Initiative Act of 1988. (This goes INTERNATIONAL in 1989.) The amendment will strengthen the ability of the Marshal's Service to perform its vital role in the nations drug and law enforcement efforts. U.S. Marshal Service occupies a crucial position on the war on drugs. It is the Marshal's Service that protects the courts and witnesses in highly sensitive drug trials and produces prisoners for trial, tracks down and captures dangerous drug fugitives, manages and disposes of criminal assets seized from drug traffickers and takes custody of and transports drug related offenders following their arrest. Those tasks constitute critical central stages of the federal criminal justice system, post arrest and pre-conviction, and without the successful performance of them, our justice system would cease to function."

They operate under these particular Acts , and when you read over to the next column, you see Mr. Bennett speaking in the middle of the page. Mr. William Bennett was the Secretary of Education, and then was promoted as the new 'Drug Czar'.

"Mr. Bennett: Mr. Chairman, the end block amendment that is before us includes a 'Sent to Congress Resolution' that read, 'The Congress encourages the United Nations to explore ways and means to accomplish an international force or mechanism aimed at stopping the trafficking of illegal drugs."

Well, there you have it: That's who they work for... The Fund and The Bank, they all have extradition clauses.

There are also explanatory statements in all of the volumes under Title 22 of the United States Code, which gives a number of acts that took place after the one quoted above, including the International Drug Enforcement Act of 1989.

The INTERPOL agents are a part of the international force under the direction and control of the Secretary General of the United Nations. The Secretary of Treasury, also known as the Alien Corporate "Governor" of The Fund and The Bank (22 USC 286, et seq.), serves as the "alternate permanent member" to INTERPOL, and the U.S. Attorney serves as the "permanent member" to INTERPOL. (From U.S. Government Manual, USNCB.) Now, when you go to THE CONSTITUTION AND GENERAL REGULATIONS FOR INTERPOL, under Article 30 you will find the following:

"In the exercise of their duties, the Secretary General and staff shall neither solicit or accept instructions from any government or authority outside the organization. They shall abstain from any action that might be prejudicial to their international task. Each member of the organization shall undertake to respect the exclusively international character of the duties of the Secretary General and the staff and abstain from influencing them in the discharge of their duties."

INTERPOL, of course, can only work through the U.S. National Central Bureau, (NCB). It has no investigative powers in any country. The organization consists of international police officers who have given up their allegiance to their individual countries for the term assigned to Interpol. Look up 8 USC 1481 and you will find expatriation.

The ("federal") Internal Revenue Service is also an Agency of the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), and solicits and collects information for 150 Foreign Powers. Under TDO 92, Internal Revenue Agents are trained under the direction of the Division of "Human Resources" (U.N.) and the Commissioner (INTERNATIONAL), by the "Office of Personnel Management". Under Executive Order 10422, the Office of Personnel Management is under the DIRECTION of the Secretary General of the United Nations. In addition, the respective agreements between The Fund and The Bank and its corporators manifestly declares its operations to be EXEMPT from ANY judicial, executive, or legislative process, and therefore these organizations and their agents are not "under the Authority of the United States" and are obviously in direct contravention of the Law of the Land. Moreover, judges and/or magistrates who are involved in "collections" for or in interest of Foreign Principals are in direct criminal violation of 18 USC 219.

Even the "U.S. Attorney General" is NOT an "Officer" of the "United States". It is the Permanent Representative to INTERPOL and pursuant to the Constitution, Rules and Regulations of INTERPOL, it must EXPATRIATE. Under the INTERPOL Constitution, primary allegiance is to the international organization and not to any other nation or state. It is not paid by the United States. It is paid by The Fund and The Bank. INTERPOL is based in Lyons, France. By the way, the "Secretary of Treasury", that is to say, the "Governor" of The Fund and The Bank, is the "ALTERNATE" representative. See: U.S. Government Manual, D.O.J., "United States National Central Bureau-International Criminal Police Organization". See also: INTERPOL Constitution.

That's probably enough to choke the average horse, but hey, sometimes people quit yawning and finally listen when this stuff ratchets up another notch. It's long gone, and anyone who thinks the average guy on the beat is going to quit his meal ticket over one more layer of business as usual is dreaming. The guys who saw the transition are retired, (and many glad of it), but the new ones have hardly a clue.

Retired San Diego Detective Phillip Worts wrote some very good documentation on COPS, a federally funded program through Department of Just Us, (Community/Communist Oriented Policing), you can find here in archives, and which ought to be read in conjunction with this thread and post, if you give a hoot how they brainwash the officers and the public.

"COMMUNITY POLICING WHAT IS IT?

Shift in philosophy about police duties vs. community responsibilities to a team concept of TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT of the community. Reidentifying the police role as a FACILITATOR in the community. (Emphasis mine).

Translation: Transformation from a constitutionally empowered local police force performing their duty to keep the peace to that of a change agent working within the community to affect a Marxist paradigm shift. Pay close attention to what the influential German Marxist Georg Lukacs had to say about who the facilitators are in the community: “The institutions in socialist society which act as the facilitators between the public and private realms are the Soviets. They [facilitators] are the congresses [diverse groups], which facilitate the debate [dialoguing to consensus] of universal problems [social issues] in the context of the everyday.”

And that's really enough for now, but you still need to UNderstand how the Warner Act was dicking around (see the Dick Act), with posse comitatus, and how it put the governors and all formerly "state" resources UNder FEMA/ DHS in an "emergency."

Go back to sleep now, boys and girls, and have a nice trap er I mean nap.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153929
01/26/2012 06:07 AM
01/26/2012 06:07 AM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,535
somewhere-where am I?
J
J. Croft Offline
Member
J. Croft  Offline
Member
J
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,535
somewhere-where am I?
Look at it this way, there won't be a need to figure out who the good or better guys are among the bad guys-and they're wearing distinguishing clothing, in conspicuous vehicles. We can pop in and out and blend in with the population.


Be your own leader

freedomguide.blogspot.com
freedomguide.wordpress.com
youtube.com/user/freedomguide
Re: DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153930
01/26/2012 12:08 PM
01/26/2012 12:08 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,752
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content OP
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content OP
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,752
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
Here's an older article from WorldNet Daily.

Army-sponsored report suggests new 'police force'

Domestic agents could be used in 'shaping an environment before a conflict'

Published: 01/20/2010


A newly released Rand Corporation report proposes the federal government create a rapid deployment “Stabilization Police Force” that would be tasked with “shaping an environment before a conflict” and restoring order in times of war, natural disaster or national emergency.

But civil libertarians are worried just exactly what the force would do, domestically or overseas.

Page 16 of the 213-page report says the new elite unit’s purpose depends on where it is and who would be in command.

“The answer to this question (about its purpose) depends on the situation into which an SPF might be inserted. The SPF could be used for missions such as: shaping an environment before a conflict; law enforcement duties in an active conflict environment; or security, stability, transition and reconstruction (SSTR) operations after a conflict. It could operate as an independent entity under a U.S. ambassador or a U.N. Senior Representative to the Secretary General (SRSG), or as a force element reporting to a Joint Task Force (JTF) commander,” the report states.

The purpose statement doesn’t say where the new unit would be deployed.
However, Rand Corporation report co-author Terry Kelly said the Army-commissioned study primarily focuses on a force that would be sent overseas.

“The unit is supposed to deploy to places like Iraq or Afghanistan or maybe even places like Haiti where there’s a tremendous disaster,” Kelly said.

Learn what some organizations want in your future, read “Hope of the Wicked: Master Plan to Rule the World”

“Really, the purpose would be to help our military forces or whoever is in charge of maintaining stability to catch terrorists or prevent major criminals from operating,” he added.

Mark Taylor, a private investigator and intelligence analyst with experience in Iraq, says he can’t see the purpose for such a force.

“With regard to overseas missions, there is the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines. If they need assistance, you have private military contractors such as XE and DynaCorp,” Taylor said.

“In my case, the company I worked for moved in, did the mission and left. Period. In the case of a federal bureaucracy, you will fund it and it will do nothing but grow into a bureaucratic nightmare,” Taylor said.

Taylor believes the additional force would just add to the confusion in any overseas situation.

“In addition the military and private contractor options, there are always the United Nations blue helmets, for whatever good they do. A federal police force would amount to nothing more than another colored helmet,” Taylor said.

Taylor’s comments about the U.N. point to the command structure of the overseas force. One of the statements in the report says the unit could serve under a U. S. foreign service officer or under U.N. authority.

Kelly admits the U.N. connection.

“It might be a U.S. ambassador who is in charge. It could work for the U.N. because there are plenty of U.N. missions that are working in different countries,” Kelly said.

“That would be the decision that our government would make that this unit would work under U.N. authority. Usually when we have our forces under U.N. authority they’re operating for a U.S. commander who is working with the U.N.,” she said.

Although the report by the federally funded think tank spends most of its pages on overseas deployment, civil libertarians wonder if the proposed unit will only focus on foreign operations.

Kelly confirmed the force could be deployed in the United States.

“If there were a major disaster like Katrina it could be deployed in the U. S. but that’s not the purpose of the research,” he said.

“It’s important to point out that the goal was to create a force that’s deployable overseas. If it’s to be used in the United States it would be a secondary thing and then only in an emergency,” Kelly said.

But Taylor believes there is no need for a federal police force to function in the U.S.

“I cannot see any positives in setting up a national police force. Cities, counties and states have control over their own law enforcement and it should remain that way. Granting the federal government the power to police each individual locality is a Gestapo waiting to happen,” Taylor said.

“If it became necessary to supplement local law enforcement in the case of another New Orleans, where a disaster situation is made more dangerous by lawless thugs looting, it would be more practical to hire a private contractor such as XE or DynaCorp to send their highly trained professionals in to stabilize the area. Once the job is done, they go on to the next (assignment),” Taylor said.

Darrell Castle is a retired Marine Corps officer with service in Vietnam, a practicing attorney and the Constitution Party’s 2008 vice presidential nominee. Castle is skeptical of the report and believes the unit could be used in the U.S. against Americans.

“First, you have to approach anything done by or for the federal government in light of what I believe the ultimate goal of the federal government to be,” Castle said.

“As I see it, the goal is to do the bidding of the international cartel of central bankers and financiers in order to assist them in building a world government police state which would entail total surveillance, total control, and the absence of what we think of as constitutional rights,” he said.

Castle added that even though the report focuses mostly on foreign deployments, some of the language leaves open the possibility for domestic use.

“To that end, the question becomes, how does a stability police force for the United States move the federal government closer to its goal of totalitarian control? When the question is asked in that manner, the answer becomes fairly obvious,” Castle warned.

Castle believes the goal is power, and a major springboard for such a power grab comes from the economy.

“Conditions have been intentionally created within the United States which make some kind of chaotic catastrophe very likely. This event could be anything the mind of man can dream up due to the overwhelming public debt and huge deficit which is budgeted to grow by trillions over the next few years,” Castle said.

“Hyperinflation and the resulting loss of the dollar’s reserve status seems unavoidable. The United States is now at deficit spending which is 40 percent of the budget and climbing,” Castle said.

To illustrate his point, Castle turned to history.

“The Weimar government in pre-Hitler Germany accelerated deficit spending to 70 percent of budget and when it did, hyperinflation occurred with its ruination of the German nation that started a cataclysmic chain of events in motion,” he said.

“The Stability Police Force then is necessary to control the population much as the U.S. military is attempting to control the remaining population of Haiti right now. It is part of a long existing effort to mingle and combine all law enforcement, federal, state, and local with the military into one force,” Castle said.

Castle is not the only one who thinks the Stabilization Police Force is the next step in establishing a totalitarian state. The Rand Corporation’s Kelly said that since the report’s release, he’s received a number of letters and phone messages making the same claim.

However, Kelly insists the study is not a master plan for authoritarian rule.

“There are all kinds of aspects of government that can be manipulated in a bad way. But it would require a whole bunch of things to go wrong. Any means of coercion that exist in the government can be manipulated if the right things go wrong,” Kelly said.

“Is it is conceivable that it could be used for a malevolent purpose? Yes, but it’s not designed to do that and its purpose would not be for power. Frankly there would be much easier tools for someone with bad intentions,” Kelly said.

“The two options we thought were viable were as a reserve option where call a whole bunch of police officers from a whole bunch of precincts. That’s a really hard thing to do,” Kelly said.

“If someone wanted to use the unit for a bad purpose it would require the cooperation of a whole bunch of people and a whole bunch of organizations,” he said.

“The other option we picked was a military unit, to create a military police unit to do the specific tasks. Military police units do military police work, not civilian police work which is what you need in these countries like Iraq and Afghanistan,” Kelly said.

“I don’t think this unit will create any more danger than already exists. If somebody wanted to do something unfortunate, there are easier ways to do it than manipulating this force,” Kelly said.

Command of the Stabilization Police Force is still a concern. Page 123 of the Rand Corporation report says the force would work best under a civilian federal agency or the military police.

“They (the data) suggest that the U.S. Marshals Service and the MP options are the only credible ones. The Marshals Service has sufficient baseline capabilities and a policing culture to build a competent SPF, and its location in the Department of Justice makes it well suited to achieve broader rule-of-law objectives. This finding is consistent with a significant body of academic and policy research, which strongly concludes that civilian agencies are optimal for the execution of policing functions.”

Taylor’s concerns about the creation of such a response force and placing the unit under a federal department come from seeing how federal operations have functioned in the past.

“Once you establish a government agency or program, it does nothing but grow into a huge bureaucratic monstrosity that feeds on the taxpayer. And, as with the case of health care, bank bailouts and the like, should the federal government even consider such an undertaking, it would amount to just another intrusion into the states’ rights to govern and intrude into the liberties of the American people,” Taylor said.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: DHS Plans Merge With Local/State Law Enforcement #153931
01/26/2012 11:43 PM
01/26/2012 11:43 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 104
Fort Worth, TX
F
FlyingPatriot Offline
Member
FlyingPatriot  Offline
Member
F
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 104
Fort Worth, TX
...speaking of which


Total Federalization of Police Under New Homeland Security Mission
Aaron Dykes
Infowars.com
January 25, 2012
A new white paper presented to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence carves out an ‘evolving mission’ for Homeland Security that moves away from fighting terrorism and towards growing a vast domestic intelligence apparatus that would expand integration with local/state agencies and private-public partnerships already underway via regional fusion centers.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/shock-d...under-new-homeland-security-mission.html


Don’t Tread On Me
RESISTOR


.
©>
©All information posted on this site is the private property of the individual author and AWRM.net and may not be reproduced without permission. © 2001-2020 AWRM.net All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1