They’re preparing the masses for the eventual revelation that the vaccines are not effective. New vaccines will be required, perhaps every six months given that antibodies (both from vaccination and natural infection) only seem to last that long. What’s more: it’s a coronavirus. One can’t effectively vaccinate against C19 any more than one could the common cold because it’s continually evolving, hence the many variants already. The narrative will be the unvaccinated caused this, but that’s obviously pseudoscience. Never the less, the unvaccinated are rapidly becoming second-class citizens, and may someday be hated by the vaccinated as the Germans once hated the Jews. It’s nearly ironic that the left spent years comparing Trump to Hitler, but perhaps that was to vaccinate the masses against any future comparisons of Biden to Hitler, or Fauci to Goebbels.

A trend I’ve observed over the years is that if you wish to know what authoritarianism America will adopt in the coming years, one needs only to observe Australia and Britain in the present. This is Australia today:

Imagine that after more than a year of the present C19 propaganda, and perhaps a year or more of the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” propaganda, you’re standing face-to-face with an individual who knows you’re unvaccinated, and whose vaccinated friend or family member is said to have recently died of C19. My suspicion is that if you weren’t armed in the moment, you might be regretful, as there will be no reasoning with the threat before you. The Germans did argue, after all, that relocation of the Jews to the camps was for their own protection from hostile non-Jews. Perhaps the unvaccinated will feel safer behind the secured perimeter of a FEMA camp, or perhaps they’ll just get vaccinated to avoid any such necessity. Coercion is a tool of compliance being wielded increasingly often, and with increasing force.

As extreme as such scenarios may appear, it would be a mistake to allow oneself to fall victim to normalcy bias. We live in extreme times, becoming more extreme by the moment, and in this world we are surrounded by individuals with increasingly extreme beliefs, and increasingly hostile attitudes. One would be wise to prepare for great adversity, rather than dismiss the growing threat of it.

We the un-vaccinated are not going to any FEMA Camps. You can not coerce us into getting the so-called vaccine. Go post your crap on a pro-Biden forum Navarro.

“If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”
― Samuel Adams

A truly disappointing response. If you’ve read what I’ve said here, and what I’ve said elsewhere in the forum, and reasoned that I advocate for these vaccines, or for the leftist ideology, then you’re bereft of the capacity for reason. It is, I assure you, your response that is “crap,” and in fact outrageous.

OK, Navarro, I am glad you are not a leftist. I saw what else you had written but when I saw you wrote in your first post above, .."Perhaps the unvaccinated will feel safer behind the secured perimeter of a FEMA Camp, or perhaps they’ll just get vaccinated to avoid any such necessity. Coercion is a tool of compliance being wielded increasingly often, and with increasing force"... It looked seemed like you were advocating putting anti-vaxers in FEMA Camps when they refuse to take the so-called vaccination.

You aren't for putting anti-vaxers in FEMA Camps are you?

Tex.
Navarro was quoting the leftists. I took his post as a warning about what they "want" to do to the masses.

No. I was stating the adversarial position to demonstrate the traitor’s potential thinking and to illustrate an obscured implication, which was, that our adversaries are utilizing increasingly heavy-handed coercion to exhaust us for the purpose of gaining our submission to vaccination, and may continue to escalate to the very threat of relocation/camps in order to break us and finally achieve compliance.

Perhaps you should be more interested in the information and analysis I’m providing you, and less concerned with attacking someone because of a sentence you think possibly means the author doesn’t pass your litmus test, despite everything else written contradicting the position you think that one sentence means the author advocates for.


Yes; appreciated.