AWRM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Pentagon Chief Ousts Hundreds of Advisers in Purge #175282
02/03/2021 12:52 PM
02/03/2021 12:52 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,741
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Offline OP
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Offline OP
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,741
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC

Pentagon Chief Ousts Hundreds of Advisers in Sweeping Purge of Trump Appointees


By RT Wednesday, February 03, 2021

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has terminated hundreds of members from 42 Pentagon advisory boards, part of an aggressive bid to oust appointees brought on in the waning days of the Donald Trump administration.

Austin ordered a far-reaching review of the advisory boards, suspending their operations and dismissing all of their members, which number in the hundreds, according to a memo obtained by the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday. Set for completion by June, Austin said the review would re-focus the committees’ efforts to “align with our most pressing strategic priorities and the National Defense Strategy.”

“As an interim step, I am directing the immediate suspension of all advisory committee operations until the review is completed,” Austin wrote in the memo, dated Saturday, adding: “I also direct, no later than February 16, 2021, the conclusion of service for all DoD [Department of Defense] advisory committee and subcommittee members.”

“No committee or subcommittee member will perform any work until properly appointed, unless they have an active appointment.”

The Pentagon advisers offer expertise in a number of areas, including business practices, policy and personnel issues. While many serve without pay, a defense official told USA Today the boards cost “several million dollars” to run each year.

The move comes after former president Trump rushed through a number of last-minute appointments to the boards before his term ended on January 20, among them retired Army Brigadier General Anthony Tata, who was rejected by the Senate after he was tapped to serve as the Pentagon’s top policy official, with lawmakers citing controversial Twitter posts. Other recent Trump appointments include former campaign officials Corey Lewandowski and David Bossie, as well as former Air Force pilot Scott O’Grady, who has echoed Trump’s repeated claims of widespread fraud in the 2020 race.

In purging the advisory boards en masse, Austin avoided singling out specific officials, which could give the appearance the decision was politically motivated, instead clearing house and starting over from scratch. The defense secretary believed that was the “most fair, most equitable way” to approach the issue, a defense official recently told reporters.

Nonetheless, Pentagon spokesman John Kirby openly acknowledged the move was prompted by the late Trump appointments, suggesting it has much to do with ousting the former president’s allies from positions of influence

“There’s no question… that the frenetic activity that occurred to the composition of so many boards in just the period of November to January deeply concerned the secretary and certainly helped drive him to this decision,” said Kirby.

Austin hinted that a review was coming last week after he suspended appointments of Trump picks for the defense advisory boards, outright blocking nominees from taking their posts. The procedure can take months given that members could be granted access to classified material and must be vetted for security clearances. Austin has halted that process.

Among the dozens of boards slated for review is the body established to advise name changes for various military bases dubbed after Confederate generals. Though Trump vocally opposed the changes, Austin will tap four new members for the board to see them through.

In addition to the advisory board purge, the new Joe Biden administration embarked on a number of other defense policy changes immediately upon taking office, some more substantial than others. While on one hand, Biden has reversed Trump’s ban on transgender people serving in the military, he is also likely to overturn his predecessor’s plan to pull out from Afghanistan. A senior NATO official told Reuters this week that the new administration wants to avoid a “hasty withdrawal” – apparently believing that two decades of bloody conflict in America’s longest war isn’t quite long enough.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Pentagon Chief Ousts Hundreds of Advisers in Purge [Re: ConSigCor] #175284
02/03/2021 01:40 PM
02/03/2021 01:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,927
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,927
Tulsa
So much for that withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Pentagon Chief Ousts Hundreds of Advisers in Purge [Re: ConSigCor] #175298
02/04/2021 01:57 PM
02/04/2021 01:57 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,927
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,927
Tulsa
It looks like we're staying in Afghanistan forever.

Quote
..."Although almost exactly a year ago the United States entered with some fanfare into a withdrawal agreement with the Taliban, peace talks between the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan and the Taliban have so far yielded few substantive results," the Special Investigator General for Afghanistan Reconstruction's 50th quarterly report to Congress noted just last week. "There has been no cease-fire agreement and high levels of insurgent and extremist violence continued in Afghanistan this quarter despite repeated pleas from senior U.S. and international officials to reduce violence in an effort to advance the peace process."

As a result, a NATO official told Reuters that "conditions have not been met. And with the new U.S. administration, there will be tweaks in the policy, the sense of hasty withdrawal which was prevalent will be addressed and we could see a much more calculated exit strategy."

The Biden administration had earlier promised "to review the February 2020 U.S.-Taliban agreement" negotiated by the Trump administration with an eye to halting or reversing the Trump administration's draw-down of troops to the lowest levels since the 2001 invasion. The new president will "assess whether the Taliban was living up to its commitments to cut ties with terrorist groups, to reduce violence in Afghanistan, and to engage in meaningful negotiations with the Afghan government and other stakeholders."

The Department of Defense appears to have already made a decision.

"The Taliban have not met their commitments," Pentagon Press Secretary John F. Kirby announced on January 28.
"Without them meeting our commitments to renounce terrorism and to stop the violent attacks on the Afghan National security forces and by dint of that the Afghan people, it's very hard to see a specific way forward for the negotiated settlement." ...


Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Pentagon Chief Ousts Hundreds of Advisers in Purge [Re: ConSigCor] #175299
02/04/2021 02:16 PM
02/04/2021 02:16 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,031
Tennessee
Hawk45 Offline
Moderator Officer Contributor
Hawk45  Offline
Moderator Officer Contributor
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,031
Tennessee
What in hell is the Deep State making money on there? Military contracts or what?


.
©>
©All information posted on this site is the private property of the individual author and AWRM.net and may not be reproduced without permission. © 2001-2020 AWRM.net All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1