AWRM
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination #176544
09/09/2021 05:41 PM
09/09/2021 05:41 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
N
Navarro Offline OP
Senior Member
Navarro  Offline OP
Senior Member
N
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
“Biden has signed an executive order mandating federal employees and contractors of federal agencies to get vaccinated without being able to opt-out and get regular testing instead ...Biden also announced an emergency requirement, enforced by the Department of Labor's OSHA, for private companies with more than 100 employees to require workers to be vaccinated or tested weekly, and to mandate vaccinations at all health care systems that receive Medicare or Medicaid funding.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/c...s-to-combat-the-delta-variant/ar-AAOgQtX

VOA DC Chief: “The Biden admin w/ enforce ‘substantial fines up to nearly $14,000 per violation’ to employers that don't abide by the vaccine or weekly testing mandate for businesses with 100 or more employees”
https://twitter.com/pwidakuswara/status/1436049517342830602?s=21

MO AG: “Biden’s historic overreach on vaccine mandates will not stand in Missouri. We’re at a crossroads in America — who we are and what we’re going to be. We must fight back.”
https://twitter.com/eric_schmitt/status/1436082838781186052?s=21

Posobiec: “USSS, FBI and DHS task forces were set up ahead of Biden remarks to monitor “violent revolt speech” online, per US official”
https://twitter.com/jackposobiec/status/1436102643378708482?s=21


Liberty and Prosperity, by Right or Might
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176545
09/09/2021 07:11 PM
09/09/2021 07:11 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,323
Tyler County, TX
T
Texas Resistance Offline
Senior Member
Texas Resistance  Offline
Senior Member
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,323
Tyler County, TX
Screw fake president Biden's fake orders. He knows the so-called vaccine will be causing a major die off within the next 3 years due to blood clots from the spike proteins protruding from the cell walls of blood vessels. He knows a lot more demoRats have taken the so-called vaccine than Republicans so he wants to make sure lots of Republicans are in the die off too so he is ordering everyone to be injected with the spike protein producing mRNA.

Mike Adams says here
"Situation Update, Sep. 8th, 2021 - Fauci bioweapons funding CONFIRMED, smoking gun proves covid vaccines based on govt biowarfare program"
https://www.brighteon.com/37495bd5-40d4-4f32-b452-63685b2b9321
that Fauci and the Chi-Coms developed the Covid-19/Corona Virus Bio-Weapon originally to kill off the hajjis in Iraq and Afghanistan but when Hillary Clinton did not get away with stealing the 2016 election they released the Covid-19/Corona Virus Bio-Weapon to harm the US and to keep Trump from winning the 2020 election. Adams says the so called booster shots and a new bio-weapon that will be released will increase the die off.

Biden just announced the new bio-weapon release. He is so senile he just admitted to it.
"In a creepily ominous foreshadowing of another pandemic, Biden said, “As I recently released the key parts of my pandemic preparedness plan so that America isn’t caught flat-footed when the new pandemic comes again, as it will, next month I ‘m also gonna release a plan in greater detail.”
https://www.infowars.com/posts/wait...the-new-pandemic-comes-again-and-it-will

Last edited by Texas Resistance; 09/09/2021 07:19 PM.

www.TexasMilitia.Info Seek out and join a lawful Militia or form one in your area. If you wish to remain Free you will have to fight for it...because the traitors will give us no choice in the matter--William Cooper
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176546
09/09/2021 08:28 PM
09/09/2021 08:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
This protest will be at the federal building in Oklahoma City, but I'm sure there will be others.

[Linked Image]

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176548
09/09/2021 08:33 PM
09/09/2021 08:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
[Linked Image]

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176549
09/09/2021 09:06 PM
09/09/2021 09:06 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
N
Navarro Offline OP
Senior Member
Navarro  Offline OP
Senior Member
N
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
“Numerous governors have issued statements following Democrat President Joe Biden’s speech on Thursday signaling that they will strongly oppose his attempts to mandate vaccines ... Tate Reeves, Mississippi ... ‘this unconstitutional move is terrifying. This is still America, and we still believe in freedom from tyrants‘ ... Kristi Noem, South Dakota: ‘My legal team is standing by ready to file our lawsuit the minute @joebiden files his unconstitutional rule. This gross example of federal intrusion will not stand’ ... Henry McMaster, South Carolina: ‘The American Dream has turned into a nightmare under Prsident Biden and the radical Democrats. They have declared war against capitalism, thumbed their noses at the Constitution, and empowered our enemies abroad. Rest assured, we will fight them to the gates of hell to protect the liberty and livelihood of every South Carolinian’ ... Doug Ducey, Arizona ... ‘ This will never stand up in court. This dictatorial approach is wrong, un-American and will do far more harm than good. How many workers will be displaced? How many kids kept out of classrooms? How many businesses fined? The vaccine is and should be a choice. We must and will push back’ ... Greg Gianforte, Montana: ‘President Biden’s vaccination mandate is unlawful and un-American. We are committed to protecting Montanans’ freedoms and liberties against this gross federal overreach’ ... Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma ... ‘ Biden is demonstrating his complete disregard for individual freedoms and states’ rights. As long as I am governor, there will be no government vaccine mandates in Oklahoma’ ... Greg Abbott, Texas ... ‘ I issued an Executive Order protecting Texans’ right to choose whether they get the COVID vaccine & added it to the special session agenda. Texas is already working to halt this power grab’ ... Mike Parsons, Missouri: ‘The Biden Administration’s recent announcement seeking to dictate personal freedom and private business decisions is an insult to our American principles of individual liberty and free enterprise. This heavy-handed action by the federal government is unwelcome in our state and has potentially dangerous consequences for working families’”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/gove...lan-will-fight-them-to-the-gates-of-hell

I’m reminded of the following quote from Biden’s speech today:
“If these governors won’t help us beat the pandemic, Ill use my powers as President to get them out of the way.”
[35:12] https://youtu.be/FFxPz0QVgw4


Liberty and Prosperity, by Right or Might
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176550
09/10/2021 10:41 AM
09/10/2021 10:41 AM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
Map of states that won’t comply…
by Kane on September 9, 2021 9:49 pm

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/map-of-states-that-wont-comply/

Updated list of states that are suing Biden — Alaska, West Virginia, Montana, Wyoming, Utah, South Dakota, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Texas, Missouri, Iowa, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Tennessee, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, and Arizona.

[Linked Image]


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176553
09/10/2021 12:31 PM
09/10/2021 12:31 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
Quote
Libertarian Party Reaction to Biden’s Six Point COVID-19 Mitigation Plan
By Whitney Bilyeu, LNC Chair on September 10, 2021 in News

“This is not about freedom or personal choice.” -President Biden, 9/9/2021

In what appeared to be a haphazard address to the American people Thursday afternoon, President Biden unveiled his six-pronged COVID-19 mitigation plan aimed at stopping the spread of the Delta variant. However, instead of offering solutions centered around innovation in healthcare or empowering local governments to determine what health policies work best for their communities, we witnessed a shocking assault on privately-owned businesses, a weaponization of government agencies, and an all-out attack on our most precious rights as individuals.

Biden’s mitigation plan will target millions of unvaccinated Americans by weaponizing the US Department of Labor — meaning people who work at companies with 100 or more employees may now face forcible vaccination, mandatory weekly testing (at a cost yet to be determined), or harsh consequences for their failure to comply. To make matters worse, these harsh consequences for non-compliant employees do not simply end at termination. In many situations, employees who are terminated for declining to be vaccinated will likely be ineligible to collect any unemployment benefits. In an already failing economy and floundering jobs market, the results will be catastrophic.

Outdoing his previous vaccine mandates for Federal government employees, Biden also announced that healthcare workers who work with patients on any type of Federally-funded healthcare plan (Medicare/Medicaid), any teachers who are a part of any Head Start program, as well as ALL government contractors, regardless of their industry, must be vaccinated or undergo weekly testing (at a cost yet to be determined) as a condition of their employment.

This is entirely unacceptable, and we shall not comply.

People may in good faith hold differing opinions over their personal need for the vaccine, and an informed and factual debate about it is entirely beneficial and appropriate. However, what is not up for debate is the right of bodily autonomy. Every individual should have the opportunity to evaluate the evidence and make the choice that they find best suited for themselves. Just like every other medical choice, the choice to be vaccinated is (and should always be) in the hands of the individual. Never should this choice be made by politicians and bureaucrats for other individuals. History is littered with example after grisly example of governments inflicting all sorts of evil on their own populace under the ostensibly benign auspices of health, safety, or “the common good.” We cannot allow our government to take us down that road.

Since the beginning of this presidency, the consistent message coming from the White House is that Americans cannot be trusted to make the best choices for themselves and for their families. We hear that businesses cannot be trusted to operate without heavy-handed micromanagement from the Federal government. We hear that schools cannot be trusted to let parents, administrators, and teachers come together to create a plan that keeps children safe, and in an environment that fosters learning and growth. Americans are tired of fighting for control of their own lives from this administration. Americans deserve to have control over their healthcare, their lives, and their livelihoods.

For 50 years, the Libertarian Party has been the only national political party fighting for all rights of all people all the time. Self-ownership is inherent to our existence and we must be free to choose for ourselves, while accepting responsibility for the consequences of the choices we make. Our support of an individual’s right to choose does not mean that we approve or disapprove of those choices. No individual, group, or government may rightly initiate force against any other individual, group, or government. We stand in defense of the rights of the smallest minority: the individual. The Libertarian Party has been pro-choice on everything since its founding, and we will continue to fight for your freedom every time the state threatens it. We are not government property.

President Biden is wrong. This is 100% about freedom and personal choice. If you want to see a world set free in your lifetime, stand with us today and together we can fight back against these grossly invasive and violative mandates that threaten our most basic and sacred of human rights.


Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176554
09/10/2021 02:16 PM
09/10/2021 02:16 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
N
Navarro Offline OP
Senior Member
Navarro  Offline OP
Senior Member
N
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
Originally Posted by Navarro

I’m reminded of the following quote from Biden’s speech today:
“If these governors won’t help us beat the pandemic, Ill use my powers as President to get them out of the way.”
[35:12] https://youtu.be/FFxPz0QVgw4

“Biden dared Republican governors and lawmakers to sue his administration over newly unveiled vaccine mandates ... ‘Have at it’ ... ‘I am so disappointed that particularly some Republican governors’ ... ‘We're playing for real here. This isn't a game’”
https://www.businessinsider.com/biden-have-at-it-gop-legal-challenges-to-vaccine-mandate-2021-9?amp

“CNN health pundit claims travel within the U.S. is a ‘privilege’ and not a constitutional right, calls for restriction of movement of unvaccinated citizens.”
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1436380639616458753?s=21

“Senior White House adviser Cedric Richmond declared Thursday that President Joe Biden would ‘run over’ governors that stood in the way of his efforts to mandate vaccinations ... said the administration wouldn't ‘let one or two individuals stand in the way’ ... would do ‘anything and everything‘“
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cedric-richmond-biden-governors-vaccine-mandates


Liberty and Prosperity, by Right or Might
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176555
09/10/2021 04:42 PM
09/10/2021 04:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
Five thought s about the OSHA vaccine mandate, by law professor Josh Blackman. Some judge, somewhere, will find the mandate unconstitutional. Long, but worth a read.

Quote
Yesterday, the Biden Administration announced that would require employers with more than 100 employees to mandate vaccination or testing. Specifically, the Department of Labor and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration will issue the rule. We do not yet have a proposed rule. Here, I will offer five tentative thoughts.

First, there will be litigation. Lots of litigation. This will be the rule that launched a thousand suits. Employers and employees across the country who object to the mandate will have standing to sue. They will bring suits in many district courts. Some judge, somewhere, will find this policy unlawful in some regard. And one of these judges may issue a nationwide injunction, or "vacate" the rule. And some court of appeals, somewhere, may agree. [Update: Under 29 U.S.C. 655(f), a pre-enforcement challenge may begin in the court of appeals]. The Biden Administration no doubt recognizes that the courts can block this policy. But this risk was worth taking. Most employers will not challenge the policy. And many companies will be happy this policy provides cover for mandating vaccines. In the interim, millions of people will get vaccinated. But this mandate could create unanticipated ripples in the workplace. Many people will simply choose to be fired, rather than get the jab. Others will submit fraudulent documents, which will lead to discipline. Unemployment numbers may actually trickle up because of this executive action. People do not respond well to mandates. Indeed, I fear this federal diktat will harden the hearts, so to speak, and exacerbate vaccine hesitancy.

Second, the rule will likely be issued very soon, before any public comment period. OSHA will likely issue an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS). OSHA used this approach to impose a vaccine mandate on healthcare workers in June 2021. The ETS became effective a few days after it appeared in the federal register. According to CRS, the last time OSHA tried to use an ETS was for a 1981 asbestos rule. And that rule was stayed. Section 6(c)(1) of the OSHA Act allows the Secretary to issue an ETS if he determines "that employees are exposed to grave danger from exposure to substances or agents determined to be toxic or physically harmful or from new hazards." Is COVID-19 a "hazard," as this term has been traditionally understood, in the same sense as a dangerous chemical? Are there other provisions of OSHA that govern exposure to diseases? If so, Section 6(c)(1) may be read to be limited to chemical hazards, rather than airborne illnesses. I need to give this issue some more thought.

Third
, does OSHA have the delegated authority to impose this requirement? I have not yet had time to study the statutory framework in any depth. For now, I will raise a broad question based on the major question doctrine and the non-delegation doctrine. As far as I understand, OSHA has traditionally regulated conduct in the workplace. For example, employees have to wear masks and the like. But this regulation governs conduct outside the workplace. More precisely, it requires employees to inject a substance in their body. Say what you will about Jacobson (my article is still going through the law review submission process), but there is some "bodily autonomy" interest at play here, that is not at play with a mask mandate. Did Congress really hide that elephantine-syringe in the OSHA "general duty" clause? Perhaps the better reading of the statute is that Congress did not delegate this authority.

Fourth, the Supreme Court's recent eviction moratorium case makes the Biden Administration's job much tougher. Courts are often skeptical when agencies attempt to use a very old statute to enact a sweeping broad new regulation. The Supreme Court reflected this concern in the eviction case. The majority favorably cited UARG and Brown & Williamson:

Quote
Even if the text were ambiguous, the sheer scope of the CDC's claimed authority under §361(a) would counsel against the Government's interpretation. We expect Congress to speak clearly when authorizing an agency to exercise powers of "vast 'economic and political significance.'" Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 573 U. S. 302, 324 (2014) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. S. 120, 160 (2000)). That is exactly the kind of power that the CDC claims here. At least 80% of the country, including between 6 and 17 million tenants at risk of eviction, falls within the moratorium.


I can see this precise authority begin used to prune the OSHA vaccine mandate. Using OSHA to mandate vaccines for 100 million-plus employees is a stunning assertion of power. The decision to push the eviction case back up to the Supreme Court makes it harder to defend the OSHS vaccine mandate. Perhaps OSHA can mandate testing, which does not implicate bodily autonomy, but cannot mandate vaccines.

Fifth, there will invariably be constitutional challenges. I do not think Congress could directly require people to get vaccinated. But the OSHA rule accomplishes that same task, indirectly, through regulations of private employers. Is this regulation within Congress's commerce powers? To answer that question, we have to define the relevant activity. Does this rule regulate conduct in the workplace? If so, that activity would be economic in nature. Or does this rule regulate a person's decision not to get vaccinated? The latter decision sounds an awful lot like a decision not to purchase health insurance. Remember, in NFIB v. Sebelius the "broccoli" horrible involved buying broccoli, not forcing people to eat broccoli. We were told the latter mandate would implicate the Due Process Clause. I would wager that forcing someone to eat a vegetable is less intrusive than forcing someone to receive a vaccine. I hope the ACLU agrees.

Even if this authority is within Congress's commerce powers, it may go beyond Congress's Necessary and Proper powers. In other words, it is not a proper use of federal power to require 100 million Americans to become vaccinated. The federal government is not simply banning guns in school zones, or prohibiting domestic violence, or growing marijuana. This rule require forcible injection of substances in the bodies–a power never before exercised by Congress. "Bodily autonomy" interest are at stake. Moreover, there is a strong federalism angle. Such health and safety laws are traditionally within the state police power. And the federal policy preempts of all state laws which prohibit vaccine mandates.

OSHA will also likely raise arguments based on "collective action" federalism– a common argument from NFIB. To prevent the spread of COVID between the several states, Congress can regulate this local activity. Still that activity must be economic in nature. Believe it or not, this precise issue came up during NFIB v. Sebelius oral arguments. I blogged about it in a now-prescient 2015 post. (I could have never fathomed that my work on Obamacare would become relevant in so many contexts.) Justice Breyer asked Attorney Michael Carvin whether the federal government could mandate inoculation against an epidemic. Mike Carvin answered no, based on Morrison (a case Breyer dissented in).

Quote
JUSTICE BREYER: I'm just picking on something. I'd like to just — if it turned out there was some terrible epidemic sweeping the United States, and we couldn't say that more than 40 or 50 percent — I can make the number as high as I want — but the — the — you'd say the Federal Government doesn't have the power to get people inoculated, to require them to be inoculated, because that's just statistical.
MR. CARVIN: Well, in all candor, I think Morrison must have decided that issue, right? Because people who commit violence against –
JUSTICE BREYER: Is your answer to that yes or no?
MR. CARVIN: Oh, I'm sorry; my answer is no, they couldn't do it, because Morrison
JUSTICE BREYER: No, they could not do it.
MR. CARVIN: Yes.
JUSTICE BREYER: They cannot require people even if this disease is sweeping the country to be inoculated. The Federal Government has no power, and if there's — okay, fine. Go ahead.


In short, Carvin explains that if the federal government lacked the power to police domestic violence in Morrison, they lack a similar power to police against inoculation.

Quote
MR. CARVIN: Violence against women obviously creates the same negative impression on fellow citizens as this communicable disease, but the –and it has huge effects on the health care of our country. … I don't know why having a disease is any more local than — that beating up a woman.


I suspect a majority of the Court agreed with Carvin in 2012. That number is probably higher today. In a way, the testing option creates another parallel to NFIB: there is a mandate to get vaccinated, and a weekly penalty (the cost of testing) for those who disregard the mandate. Or, people have a choice between getting vaccinated, and paying for testing at their own cost.

Here, I think the major question doctrine plays an important role. To avoid reading OSHA as authorizing such a limitless power, the court would prefer a more narrow reading of the statute that did not delegate this power. The eviction moratorium case supports this narrowing construction. And there is a fall-back: testing. Severing the rule to permit testing, but not the mandate, could provide a viable outcome for the courts.

To reiterate my first point, even if these challenges are ultimately successful, the policy will have its intended effect in the interim: millions of people will get vaccinated rather than risk losing their jobs. Indeed, perhaps the best time to resolve this constitutional question would be after the pandemic concludes, and tempers cool.

These thoughts are only tentative, and I will revisit them after the rule is published. I welcome any comments.


Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176556
09/10/2021 07:22 PM
09/10/2021 07:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
They can't make you take the shot if you wont take it.

Time to man up, grab your sack and tell them where to stick it.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176558
09/10/2021 10:30 PM
09/10/2021 10:30 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
N
Navarro Offline OP
Senior Member
Navarro  Offline OP
Senior Member
N
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
“For months, it was the vaccine-resistant that the president treated with kid gloves ... Americans are seeing the president take the sharpest course correction to date ... ‘He’s going as far as he can in calling out the true enemy. The true enemy is one wing of his opposition,’ said Paul Maslin, a pollster and consultant — using stark language reflecting Democrats rising level of fury and frustration with the vaccine holdouts.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...he-screws-on-the-unvaccinated/ar-AAOj1Wu


Liberty and Prosperity, by Right or Might
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176559
09/10/2021 10:33 PM
09/10/2021 10:33 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
This is the line that must not be crossed. Everyone should go Galt and dare them to cross our line.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176560
09/11/2021 01:41 PM
09/11/2021 01:41 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
There Is No Turning Back After This

September 9, 2021 by Michael Snyder


This is the most sickening thing that Joe Biden has ever done. That is saying a lot, because Biden has a long history of doing sickening things. For the past couple of hours I have been trying to find the right words to put what we just witnessed into proper perspective. This truly is one of the most pivotal moments in American history, and there will be no turning back after this. We are descending into full-blown tyranny, and I have literally felt sick to my stomach as I have pondered the ramifications. What remained of the country that so many of us once loved is being absolutely eviscerated, and it is deeply heartbreaking to watch it happen.

The new mandates that Biden has decided to impose on the entire country aren’t just un-American. The word “evil” gets thrown around a lot these days, but in this case it perfectly fits the situation.

No government has the right to try to put something into your body by force. Many have pointed out that such mandates are uncomfortably close to physical rape, and there is absolutely no place for such mandates in a free and just society.

According to CNN, Biden’s offensive new mandates “could apply to as many as 100 million Americans”, but I have a feeling that the true number could be even higher than that.

Biden’s new mandates apply to all federal employees and contractors, anyone that works at any business that has 100 or more employees, and to the entire health care industry.

Previously, the Biden administration had allowed federal workers that didn’t want to be vaccinated the option of submitting to regular testing instead, but now the option for testing is out the window…

President Biden on Thursday signed an executive order mandating that all federal employees and contractors get vaccinated against COVID-19, with no exceptions for those who agree to regular testing for the virus, according to a source familiar with the plans.

Vast numbers of federal employees will now be faced with the heartbreaking choice of either taking an injection that they do not want or giving up their careers.

But Biden didn’t stop there.

Shockingly, he has decided to target more than 80 million Americans that work for large companies that employ at least 100 workers. The following comes from the official White House website…

The Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is developing a rule that will require all employers with 100 or more employees to ensure their workforce is fully vaccinated or require any workers who remain unvaccinated to produce a negative test result on at least a weekly basis before coming to work. OSHA will issue an Emergency Temporary Standard (ETS) to implement this requirement. This requirement will impact over 80 million workers in private sector businesses with 100+ employees.

As you read that, you probably thought to yourself that this can’t possibly be legal.

And you would be right.

But the Biden administration is probably counting on getting in front of some friendly judges that will issue favorable rulings that will make it “legal”.

On top of all this, the Biden administration is also going after any health care institutions that accept Medicaid or Medicare. Here is more from the official White House website…

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is taking action to require COVID-19 vaccinations for workers in most health care settings that receive Medicare or Medicaid reimbursement, including but not limited to hospitals, dialysis facilities, ambulatory surgical settings, and home health agencies. This action builds on the vaccination requirement for nursing facilities recently announced by CMS, and will apply to nursing home staff as well as staff in hospitals and other CMS-regulated settings, including clinical staff, individuals providing services under arrangements, volunteers, and staff who are not involved in direct patient, resident, or client care. These requirements will apply to approximately 50,000 providers and cover a majority of health care workers across the country.

Basically, this covers pretty much the entire health care industry in this country.

Any health care worker that refuses to get an injection won’t just lose a job. In essence, they will become banned from ever working in their chosen field ever again.

There is much more to Biden’s plan, and you can read all about it right here.

In his speech announcing these new mandates, Biden made it quite clear what he thinks about our “freedoms”…

“This is not about freedom or personal choice,” Biden said. “It’s about protecting yourself and those around you.”

Others on his side of the political spectrum have also spoken very derisively about freedom in recent days. Sadly, there are millions of Americans that actually support this sort of tyrannical approach.

Of course before he entered the White House Biden promised us that this would never happen. For example, he made the following statement back in December…

While speaking in Wilmington, Del., on Dec. 4, 2020, Biden was asked whether COVID vaccinations should be mandatory. He said, “No, I don’t think it should be mandatory. I wouldn’t demand it to be mandatory.”

And as recently as July, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki was speaking against any sort of a federal mandate…

In July, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki told reporters that a federal vaccine mandate was “not the role of the federal government.”

She was right when she said that.

But now here in September she is strongly defending what Biden has just done.

Following Biden’s speech, there was a tremendous explosion of anger on social media, because people are recognizing that this is full-blown tyranny.

We have come to a moment when none of our national leaders can afford to be silent. This is a moment that will fundamentally change our country forever, and history will judge those that refuse to take a stand very harshly.

Fortunately, some national leaders are already speaking out. For example, Representative Thomas Massie has correctly recognized that Biden’s mandates are clearly unconstitutional…

Republican Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky blasted Biden’s order as ‘unconstitutional.’

‘OSHA has no more authority to enforce this (there’s no statutory authorization) than CDC had to issue the eviction moratorium,’ Massie said. ‘Which is to say they both have ZERO authority to do these things. Congress makes the laws in a constitutional republic.’

And a couple of governors are already threatening to take the Biden administration to court. In fact, Kristi Noem says that she has her legal team standing by…

Reacting to the news, Republican South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem said her “legal team is standing by ready to file our lawsuit the minute @joebiden files his unconstitutional rule.”

“This gross example of federal intrusion will not stand,” she said.

Georgia Governor Brian Kemp also sounds like he is ready for a legal fight…

She was joined by fellow Republican Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, who wrote ‘I will pursue every legal option available to the state of Georgia to stop this blatantly unlawful overreach by the Biden administration’ on Twitter Thursday evening.

Unfortunately, the outcome of such cases is usually determined by the political leanings of the judges that are assigned to them.

In this country, most judges simply do whatever they feel like doing. So most of the time liberal judges issue rulings that liberals would like, and conservative judges issue rulings that conservatives would like.

Needless to say, it shouldn’t work that way, but at this point our judiciary has become just about as lawless as our society as a whole.

And lawless societies almost always end up descending into tyranny, and that is happening to us right now.

These are such dark days for our nation, and they are only going to get darker.

For years, I have been pleading for the American people to wake up because our liberties and freedoms were steadily being eroded.

Now we have gotten to a point where the guy in the White House is enthusiastically taking a sledgehammer to the few liberties and freedoms that we still have left, and unless the American people stand up and object they will soon be totally gone.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176561
09/11/2021 02:56 PM
09/11/2021 02:56 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,323
Tyler County, TX
T
Texas Resistance Offline
Senior Member
Texas Resistance  Offline
Senior Member
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,323
Tyler County, TX
Biden is a senile tyrant that needs to be impeached and confined to a nursing home (LOL).

"Members of Congress And Their Staff Are Exempt From Biden’s Vax Mandate"
https://www.infowars.com/posts/memb...staff-are-exempt-from-bidens-vax-mandate

"Alex Jones Responds To Joe Biden’s Declaration Of War Against America." " Biden just declared himself medical dictator over America. No State’s rights. Total power over all private businesses, just like the CDC claiming authority over landlords. This is a global corporate takeover of America."
https://www.infowars.com/posts/bide...es-dictatorial-powers-forced-injections/


www.TexasMilitia.Info Seek out and join a lawful Militia or form one in your area. If you wish to remain Free you will have to fight for it...because the traitors will give us no choice in the matter--William Cooper
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176562
09/11/2021 03:30 PM
09/11/2021 03:30 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
A couple scenes from the protest in Oklahoma City. I had hoped for more people, but it really was pretty short notice.

[Linked Image]

Here is Will Daugherty speaking at the protest.



Onward and upward,
airforce

Last edited by airforce; 09/11/2021 03:38 PM.
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176564
09/11/2021 11:29 PM
09/11/2021 11:29 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
Our little Oklahoma City protest made the news! Yes, a handful of people really can make a difference.

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176565
09/12/2021 11:18 AM
09/12/2021 11:18 AM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
N
Navarro Offline OP
Senior Member
Navarro  Offline OP
Senior Member
N
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
Quote
Video: “Biden to announce more vaccine measures ahead of the UN general assembly, according to the U.S. Surgeon General”
https://twitter.com/raw_news1st/status/1437050831413649412?s=21

“Biden will announce new steps to slow the spread of COVID-19 before the U.N. General Assembly meets”
https://www.usnews.com/news/top-new...ahead-of-un-meeting-surgeon-general-says

“U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres issued a dire warning that the world is moving in the wrong direction and faces ‘a pivotal moment’ where continuing business as usual could lead to a breakdown of global order and a future of perpetual crisis ... must reverse today’s dangerous trends and choose ‘the breakthrough scenario’ ... tackle the climate crisis ... ‘unchecked inequality‘ ... technology’s advances ‘without guard rails’ ... poverty, hunger ... ‘conspiracy theories’ ... multilateral institutions have proven to be ‘too weak’ ... What’s needed, Guterres said, is not new multilateral bureaucracies but more effective multilateral institutions including a United Nations ‘2.0’ ... ‘with teeth’ ... called for an immediate global vaccination plan implemented by an emergency task force ... recommended a series of measures ‘to provide universal health coverage, education, housing, decent work and income protection for everyone, everywhere’ ... proposed holding a World Social Summit ... proposed global action to tackle disinformation and conspiracy theories”
https://apnews.com/article/technolo...andemic-dcabfc7526f46940dc5a992d52737c8b

We are transitioning from authoritarianism to totalitarianism. May God have mercy on those very few of us who love Liberty; may He provide us with the strength and courage necessary to effectively challenge this profound evil.


Liberty and Prosperity, by Right or Might
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176572
09/12/2021 10:25 PM
09/12/2021 10:25 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,323
Tyler County, TX
T
Texas Resistance Offline
Senior Member
Texas Resistance  Offline
Senior Member
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,323
Tyler County, TX
“Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.”
― John Knox


Biden has become a tyrant. In his speech on September 9th announcing the vaccine mandates Biden said, "...“We’ve been patient, but our patience is wearing thin"...

[Linked Image]

The virus has mutated so the so-called vaccine doesn't work any more.
"80% of COVID-19 Deaths in August Were People Who Had Been Vaccinated According to Public Health Data"
https://www.globalresearch.ca/80-co...ted-according-public-health-data/5755388

The so-called vaccine is really an mRNA gene therapy that causes spike proteins to stick out of the cells lining blood vessels which will cause blood clots which will cause heart disease. "Doctor says mRNA vaccines "will kill most people" through heart failure, 62% of vaccinated people already show microscopic blood clots" https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07-13-doctor-says-mrna-vaccines-kill-most-people.html

At least 45,000 people in the United States have died within three days of being injected. See:
"America’s Frontline Doctors attorney files lawsuit against U.S. government for 45,000 covid vaccine deaths" https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-07...uit-government-covid-vaccine-deaths.html

Mike Adams says here
"Situation Update, Sep. 8th, 2021 - Fauci bioweapons funding CONFIRMED, smoking gun proves covid vaccines based on govt biowarfare program"
https://www.brighteon.com/37495bd5-40d4-4f32-b452-63685b2b9321
That Fauci and the Chi-Coms developed the Covid-19/Corona Virus Bio-Weapon originally to kill off the hajjis in Iraq and Afghanistan but when Hillary Clinton did not get away with stealing the 2016 election they released the Covid-19/Corona Virus Bio-Weapon to harm the US and to keep Trump from winning the 2020 election. Adams says the so called booster shots and a new bio-weapon that will be released will increase the die off.

Biden announced a new bio-weapon release. He is so senile he admitted to it.
"In a creepily ominous foreshadowing of another pandemic, Biden said, “As I recently released the key parts of my pandemic preparedness plan so that America isn’t caught flat-footed when the new pandemic comes again, as it will, next month I ‘m also gonna release a plan in greater detail.”
https://www.infowars.com/posts/wait...the-new-pandemic-comes-again-and-it-will

"F*CK JOE BIDEN!" https://banned.video/watch?id=613e7c3dc5260f1e67786d13





www.TexasMilitia.Info Seek out and join a lawful Militia or form one in your area. If you wish to remain Free you will have to fight for it...because the traitors will give us no choice in the matter--William Cooper
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176579
09/14/2021 09:27 AM
09/14/2021 09:27 AM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
N
Navarro Offline OP
Senior Member
Navarro  Offline OP
Senior Member
N
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
“Two sheriffs in Arkansas ... said they will not mandate COVID-19 vaccines for their employees ... ‘As law enforcement officers, our first duty and what we swear an oath to, is to support the Constitution of the United States, and the Constitution of the State of Arkansas. It is in that defense and the defense of individual liberty that the Cleburne County Sheriff’s Office has not, and will not mandate the COVID vaccine for any of our employees’ ... ‘It's time for our politicians and other public servants to stand up and remember that their first responsibility is to protect people’s rights, not to run their lives.’”
https://www.localmemphis.com/mobile...522-e81bb29e-6a85-424a-b1e2-f2e96788b45b


Liberty and Prosperity, by Right or Might
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176580
09/14/2021 01:04 PM
09/14/2021 01:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
The Logan County sheriff here in Oklahoma has said the same thing.

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176581
09/14/2021 02:32 PM
09/14/2021 02:32 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
Fauci: We’re Going to ‘Mandate’ CV Shots if ‘Hardcore Group’ of Holdouts Are Not ‘Persuaded’ to Submit

By Chris Menahan | Information Liberation Tuesday, September 14, 2021

White House chief medical adviser Antony Fauci said over the weekend that the Biden regime is going to “mandate” everyone including children take Big Pharma’s experimental shots if they’re not “persuaded” to take them and called for banning Americans from flying, going to work, college and school if they refuse to submit.

The move comes just days after Fauci said Americans will need to take a third booster shot to be considered “fully vaccinated.”

“We have a pretty hardcore group of people that we’re trying to persuade them — or mandate them if they’re not persuaded — to get vaccinated,” Fauci told the Association of LGBTQ Journalists on Sunday.

Fauci went on to claim that vaccinating this “recalcitrant group” would be “the key to ending this [pandemic]” before immediately walking back his sweeping claim and saying it would only “cut down” the overall number of infections.

“So we have about 75 million people who are eligible to be vaccinated who have not yet gotten vaccinated, that’s the key to ending this,” Fauci said. “I mean that would be the key, um, you would cut down dramatically the number of infections if we got the overwhelming majority of that recalcitrant group vaccinated.”

Fauci also said over the weekend that unvaxxed Americans should be banned from flying and children should be forced to take the shot to go to school (even though studies show boys are more at risk from the shot than the virus itself).

Fauci claimed that if we got 70% of Americans vaccinated we’d achieve “herd immunity” but ultra-vaxxed Israel where over 84% of adults are vaccinated reported the highest number of cases per capita in the world just two weeks ago and their government is rolling out booster shots already and telling everyone to prepare for a fourth shot in the near future.

Ireland, where nearly 90% of the adult population is vaxxed, reported Friday that 54% of patients in their hospitals with covid were fully vaccinated.

Fauci on Friday said he would personally order everyone to take Big Pharma’s experimental injections in order to have a job.


Last year, Fauci brushed off the notion of mandatory vaccines and said the government “would never mandate” them “for any element of the general public.”

“I don’t see [a vaccine mandate] on a national level merely because of all the situations you have upon encroaching upon a person’s freedom to make their own choice of their own health,” Fauci said during another interview.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: ConSigCor] #176582
09/14/2021 03:37 PM
09/14/2021 03:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
Originally Posted by ConSigCor
the Biden regime is going to “mandate” everyone including children take Big Pharma’s experimental shots if they’re not “persuaded” to take them and called for banning Americans from flying, going to work, college and school if they refuse to submit.


Good luck with that.

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: airforce] #176583
09/14/2021 04:29 PM
09/14/2021 04:29 PM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 200
N.E. Wa.
Kelldor42 Offline
Senior Member
Kelldor42  Offline
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 200
N.E. Wa.
I'm waiting to see what my employer does. We have federal contracts, large aircraft manufacturer, so I'm doubtful that the test out option will be available. If not, my career is over. From what I am seeing out there, religious exemptions are being denied, especially to employees of WA State.

If this happens, I have no incentive whatsoever to participate in the economy. My Galt's Gulch needs more work, and im getting a lot done, but I will have to learn how to survive with what I have. It will be hard but i like my chances. I hope you all are doing well.


https://mtc.cdn.vine.co/r/videos/BA...sionId=4t5.0tXamTaMhBZwfXljf3ZmZOMXKupj "Honestly, um, there are things more important than your life, and freedom is one of them."
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176584
09/14/2021 04:35 PM
09/14/2021 04:35 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,323
Tyler County, TX
T
Texas Resistance Offline
Senior Member
Texas Resistance  Offline
Senior Member
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,323
Tyler County, TX
I would take a job flipping burgers before taking their mRNA injection. The less money I make the less they can tax me. I will go totally feral if I have to and live out in the woods, trap and hunt if I have to.

That sorry traitor Fauci who paid the Chi-Coms to create the corona virus needs to be arrested at once then that punk Fauci cannot mandate anything and will be some faggot's bitch in prison.

Imprison Anthony Fauci now!

The so-vaccine does not work and it has caused the virus to mutate to a much more easily transmitted disease.

From : https://www.infowars.com/posts/vide...ears-in-jail-for-fauci-lying-to-congress

Appearing on Hannity Wednesday night, Senator Rand Paul responded to the emergence of yet more proof that Anthony Fauci lied to Congress regarding the funding of coronavirus gain of function research, reminding viewers that the offence is a felony punishable by five years jail time.

“I find that hard to believe that we still would have someone with such poor judgment, who believes that even a pandemic would be worth it, that this person is in charge of the research for our government, I find that astounding,” Paul declared.

“The judgment that we should continue to fund this lab and—that the virus in all likelihood came from the lab. I think it’s such incredibly poor judgment that he should be immediately removed,” Paul added.

The Senator added, “We’ve referred it to the Department of Justice. I don’t think Biden’s Department of Justice will do anything with it but yes, it is very dangerous to have public officials who we need to have trust in coming and lying to us, but [Fauci] has lied dozens of times.”

Paul continued, “Usually, he tells us that it’s for our own good but yes, he has dissembled, he has obfuscated—there’s other nicer words—but he has definitely lied to the American public and he should be held responsible but not just that.”

FOX NEWS, Fauci's Lies Finally Exposed
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLdVw74uyos

Arkansas senator Tom Cotton demands Anthony Fauci be prosecuted for his lies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=akLj7D4tZ1k

Josh Hawley (R-MO) called on President Biden, Sec. Antony Blinken, and Sec. Lloyd Austin to resign.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcDdrozlEKc

[Linked Image]


www.TexasMilitia.Info Seek out and join a lawful Militia or form one in your area. If you wish to remain Free you will have to fight for it...because the traitors will give us no choice in the matter--William Cooper
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176589
09/14/2021 09:08 PM
09/14/2021 09:08 PM
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
ConSigCor Online content
Senior Member
ConSigCor  Online Content
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 19,737
A 059 Btn 16 FF MSC
Kelldor, If they try to force it on you screw them every way you can Take sick leave, vacation, whatever...milk them for every dime you can while doing nothing for them. Got retirement...pull it out if you can. Get ready to participate in the black market/underground economy. And, while your at it. sue the bastards. People are already doing it.


"The time for war has not yet come, but it will come and that soon, and when it does come, my advice is to draw the sword and throw away the scabbard." Gen. T.J. Jackson, March 1861
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176596
09/15/2021 12:44 AM
09/15/2021 12:44 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
I put the odds at about 95% that some judge, somewhere, will declare the mandate unconstitutional and issue an injunction. (I'd put the odds at 100% if Trump had issued the mandate.)

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176599
09/15/2021 11:05 AM
09/15/2021 11:05 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
Court halts vaccine mandate for New York workers.

Quote
In two separate rulings yesterday, courts temporarily rejected New York state's attempts to require various kinds of workers to get the COVID-19 vaccine.

First, federal Judge David Hurd of the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of New York temporarily blocked an August 26 order requiring all hospital and nursing home workers in the state to be vaccinated. The state mandate does not contain a religious exemption, and was challenged by 17 people who say getting the vaccine violates their religious beliefs.

The state's department of health is temporarily barred "from enforcing, threatening to enforce, attempting to enforce, or otherwise requiring compliance with the vaccine mandate," Hurd wrote in his Tuesday ruling. Furthermore, it cannot take "any action, disciplinary or otherwise, against the licensure, certification, residency, admitting privileges or other professional status or qualification of any plaintiffs on account of their seeking or having obtained a religious exemption from mandatory COVID-19 vaccination."

Later on Tuesday, state court judge Laurence L. Love temporarily blocked New York City's requirement that teachers and other education staff be vaccinated against the coronavirus. The mandate—set to go into effect on September 27—was challenged by teachers unions.

But "a City Hall spokesperson downplayed the significance of the decision, saying that based on the ruling there 'is no delay' in the mandate's implementation," reports the New York Post:

[quote] "New York City's education worker vaccine mandate, which has been embraced by the White House, goes into effect on September 27. The court's action today expires on September 22," the spokesperson said.

Last week, a city arbitrator ruled that DOE workers may apply for medical or religious exemptions.


I suspect this decision is just the first of many.

Onward and upward,
airforce

Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176602
09/15/2021 04:54 PM
09/15/2021 04:54 PM
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,323
Tyler County, TX
T
Texas Resistance Offline
Senior Member
Texas Resistance  Offline
Senior Member
T
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,323
Tyler County, TX
"How Americans can resist coronavirus shot mandates – a comprehensive guide"
"Here is a comprehensive list of resources, including sample exemption letters, for Americans seeking relief from forced coronavirus injections."

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/r.../?utm_source=urgent&utm_campaign=usa


www.TexasMilitia.Info Seek out and join a lawful Militia or form one in your area. If you wish to remain Free you will have to fight for it...because the traitors will give us no choice in the matter--William Cooper
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176607
09/16/2021 10:04 AM
09/16/2021 10:04 AM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
N
Navarro Offline OP
Senior Member
Navarro  Offline OP
Senior Member
N
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Saint Louis, Missouri, USA
“In what may go down as one of the most significant attempts to expand the power of the presidency in modern history, President Biden announced on Sept. 9 a series of sweeping new vaccine mandates ... The decision to impose vaccines nationwide is one of the most stunning moves made by any president ... Biden has violated both the spirit and explicit language of the Constitution. If the president is permitted to run roughshod over our constitutional liberties in such a reckless manner, future presidents could further erode our freedoms and undermine the protections guaranteed to every citizen by the Constitution ... Others have pointed to a Supreme Court case from 1905, Jacobson v. Massachusetts ... In Jacobson, the Supreme Court determined that a local vaccine mandate is permissible under the Constitution because states have maintained their police powers and authority to regulate public health under the 10th Amendment, which guarantees, ‘The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.’ But the decision in Jacobson does not include language indicating that the national government has the same authority ... Nothing in the Constitution suggest that the executive branch can impose blanket vaccine regulations on private businesses or their employees. The only question that remains is whether the Supreme Court will strike down Biden's mandate. If the court refuses to get involved, the public will suffer for generations, as one presidential administration after another erodes its hard-won liberties.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bidens-wildly-unconstitutional-vaccine-mandate/ar-AAOrv1y


Liberty and Prosperity, by Right or Might
Re: Biden Edict Requires Businesses to Mandate Employee Vaccination [Re: Navarro] #176622
09/18/2021 11:53 AM
09/18/2021 11:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
airforce Online content
Administrator
airforce  Online Content
Administrator
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23,919
Tulsa
Can we really "protect the vaccinated from the unvaccinated," like Biden claimed? Nope. From Ryan McMaken at the Mises Institute:

Quote
The official line on vaccines is that they are extremely effective at protecting against serious illness. And yet these same people are also claiming that the unvaccinated are a major threat to the vaccinated.

More specifically, President Biden claimed on September 10 that vaccine mandates were to “protect the vaccinated workers from unvaccinated workers.”

In other words, it is claimed that vaccines are remarkably effective, and that the vaccinated must also be protected from the unvaccinated. How can both claims be true at the same time? They can’t. The idea that vaccinated people are being frequently harmed by the unvaccinated is a complete fabrication, based on the promandate crowd’s own mainstream data.

As Robert Fellner points out, according to the official data,

Quote
The odds of a vaccinated person dying from COVID are 1 in 137,000.

The fatality rate for seasonal flu, meanwhile, is at least 100 times greater than that. The chance of dying in an automobile accident is over 1,000 times greater. Dog attacks, bee stings, sunstroke, cataclysmic storms, and a variety of other background risks we accept as a normal part of life are all more deadly than the risk COVID poses to the vaccinated.


Moreover, the risk of death to vaccinated people is similar to the risk of having an adverse side effect to the vaccine. And as the spokesmen for Big Pharma and the regime never tire of telling us, you shouldn’t care about having an adverse reaction, because it is so very rare and inconsequential.

So by that reasoning, vaccinated people shouldn’t worry about getting very ill from covid. Those cases are just as rare as the so, so rare cases of adverse reaction.


And yet, even after all of this, the backers of vaccine mandates are trying to whip up hysteria about how we must “protect the vaccinated,” who are in grave danger, thanks to the unvaccinated.

The level of mental and logical incoherence necessary to come to this conclusion is quite a feat.

It Doesn’t Stop the Spread

It must also be remembered that vaccination does not stop the spread of covid.

Fellner continues:

Quote
But as [the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's] Dr. Walensky explained last month, while the COVID vaccines remain incredibly effective at preventing serious illness and death, “what they cannot do anymore is prevent transmission.” This reflects the official position of the agency as well, which is why the CDC now requires vaccinated people to mask indoors and follow the same type of social distancing practices as unvaccinated people.

The official confirmation that COVID is endemic, and vaccination cannot stop transmission and thereby eliminate it in the way it could for things like polio and smallpox, makes mandates intolerable to a free society. The entire argument for mandatory vaccination originally rested on the claim that the vaccines could reliably stop transmission.[/b]

Moreover, those who are vaccinated often experience a mild form of covid when they are reinfected, which means they often spread the disease without even knowing they have it. The vaccinated also carry the same viral load as the unvaccinated, as noted last month by the UK’s Evening Standard:

[quote] While evidence demonstrates that vaccines significantly reduce hospitalisations and deaths, scientists now believe those infected by the Delta variant can still harbour similar levels of virus to those who are unvaccinated.


Previous thinking was that vaccinations would stop the spread, but now

Quote
this has been thrown into doubt and raises questions about vaccine passports … which work on the assumption that double-jabbed people are less likely to spread the virus.


Yet again, we see the notion that the vaccinated are being endangered by the unvaccinated is a fantasy of the mandate activists.

At least the CDC is being logical when it says the vaccinated should keep wearing masks. Indeed, every time we hear this from the CDC we should remind ourselves: vaccination does not stop the spread.

They're Filling Up the Hospitals!

There is a secondary fallback position the mandate pushers also use: that the unvaccinated are taking up all the intensive care beds and therefore denying people with other conditions the hospital beds that are allegedly more deserved by others.

As I pointed out here, this is also an inconsistent argument, since this argument rests on the idea that people who make unhealthy choices (like not taking a vaccine) ought to be treated as pariahs.

This only applies to one single “unhealthy choice.” These mandate pushers are apparently perfectly fine with drug abusers, smokers, and morbidly obese victims of type 2 diabetes—the numbers of whom have been multiplying—filling up all the ICU beds. No, those people deserve their hospital beds even though they made the choice to destroy their own health. In fact if one suggests people lay off the meth pipe, the Big Gulps, or the Marlboros—in an effort to improve health—one is an intolerable "fat shamer" or someone who blames the victims.

In any case, recent data has also emerged questioning whether or not the data on hospitalizations is very useful in identifying the load imposed on ICUs by covid patients.

A recent study showed that nearly half (i.e., 48 percent) of covid hospitalizations in 2020 were mild cases. According to The Atlantic (not exactly a hotbed of antivaccine rhetoric):

Quote
The study found that from March 2020 through early January 2021—before vaccination was widespread, and before the Delta variant had arrived—the proportion of patients with mild or asymptomatic disease was 36 percent. From mid-January through the end of June 2021, however, that number rose to 48 percent. In other words, the study suggests that roughly half of all the hospitalized patients showing up on COVID-data dashboards in 2021 may have been admitted for another reason entirely, or had only a mild presentation of disease.


And why are there fewer severe cases now? It may be because "unvaccinated patients in the vaccine era tend to be a younger cohort who are less vulnerable to COVID and may be more likely to have been infected in the past."

Get Vaccinated Even If You Already Had Covid!

But no matter! All that matters is getting people vaccinated, and it’s all for your own good, and governments ought to be able to force medications on you. The cynical refrain of the proabortion left, “Get your laws off my body,” only applies to one single case. In every other case, the state owns you.

This drive for vaccination no matter what can also be seen in the effort to vaccinate even those who have already recovered from covid. The claim here is that those who have natural immunity should get jabbed because they have a higher incidence of reinfection—although it is admitted cases of reinfection tend to be far milder than the initial case.

Specifically, those pushing vaccination in this case may point to a study suggesting the unvaccinated are 2.34 times more likely to be reinfected than the vaccinated.

Yet, according to the promandate crowd, this is 2.34 times larger than an extremely small number. After all, we’re frequently told that cases of reinfection for the vaccinated are “extremely rare” and inconsequential. So, that means that for the unvaccinated the odds of reinfection are a little more than double an inconsequential number. Now, I don’t have a degree in mathematics, but I have taken enough calculus and statistics classes to know that 2.3 times “basically zero” is also “basically zero.”


But that is the math being used by those who insist that the risk of reinfection for the vaccinated is negligible while the risk of reinfection for the already recovered is an enormous public health crisis.

According the mandate pushers’ own data, the drive to protect the vaccinated from the unvaccinated makes no sense at all. But I suspect they’ll stick with the slogan, or even double down on it.


Onward and upward,
airforce


.
©>
©All information posted on this site is the private property of the individual author and AWRM.net and may not be reproduced without permission. © 2001-2020 AWRM.net All Rights Reserved.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1.1