Quote
Originally posted by GreginOhio:
Verizon is absolutely not the only wireless carrier doing this type of thing.

While in the employment of a certain "pin drop quiet" company as a Wireless Network Operations Manager, I was required to supervise the installation of hi-cap shelves (back in the circuit-switched days) that routinely routed customer's calls through it....
The Washington Post is now reporting that the NSA and FBI are tapping directly into the central servers of nine leading internet companies .

Quote
The National Security Agency and the FBI are tapping directly into the central servers of nine leading U.S. Internet companies, extracting audio and video chats, photographs, e-mails, documents, and connection logs that enable analysts to track one target or trace a whole network of associates, according to a top-secret document obtained by The Washington Post.

The program, code-named PRISM, has not been made public until now. It may be the first of its kind. The NSA prides itself on stealing secrets and breaking codes, and it is accustomed to corporate partnerships that help it divert data traffic or sidestep barriers. But there has never been a Google or Facebook before, and it is unlikely that there are richer troves of valuable intelligence than the ones in Silicon Valley.

Graphic
NSA slides explain the PRISM data-collection program
Click Here to View Full Graphic Story

NSA slides explain the PRISM data-collection program

Related stories
‘No Such Agency’ spies on the communications of the world
‘No Such Agency’ spies on the communications of the world

Anne Gearan 4:35 PM ET

The National Security Agency, nicknamed such for years, is the U.S. government’s eavesdropper-in-chief.
Report: NSA asked Verizon for all U.S. call data
Report: NSA asked Verizon for all U.S. call data

Ellen Nakashima 6:51 AM ET

If document requiring company to submit phone records for millions of Americans is authentic, it would be the broadest surveillance order known to date.
All about the NSA surveillance program.
All about the NSA surveillance program.

Timothy B. Lee 2:46 PM ET

What has the government been doing? Is it legal? Does it mean some bureaucrat somewhere has heard all your phone calls? Read on to find out.
Administration, lawmakers defend NSA program to collect phone logs
Administration, lawmakers defend NSA program to collect phone logs

Ellen Nakashima, Jerry Markon and Ed O’Keefe 12:53 PM ET

The National Security Agency secretly collected phone records of millions of Verizon customers.

Equally unusual is the way the NSA extracts what it wants, according to the document: “Collection directly from the servers of these U.S. Service Providers: Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, Apple.”

PRISM was launched from the ashes of President George W. Bush’s secret program of warrantless domestic surveillance in 2007, after news media disclosures, lawsuits and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court forced the president to look for new authority.

Congress obliged with the Protect America Act in 2007 and the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, which immunized private companies that cooperated voluntarily with U.S. intelligence collection. PRISM recruited its first partner, Microsoft, and began six years of rapidly growing data collection beneath the surface of a roiling national debate on surveillance and privacy. Late last year, when critics in Congress sought changes in the FISA Amendments Act, the only lawmakers who knew about PRISM were bound by oaths of office to hold their tongues.

The court-approved program is focused on foreign communications traffic, which often flows through U.S. servers even when sent from one overseas location to another. Between 2004 and 2007, Bush administration lawyers persuaded federal FISA judges to issue surveillance orders in a fundamentally new form. Until then the government had to show probable cause that a particular “target” and “facility” were both connected to terrorism or espionage.

In four new orders, which remain classified, the court defined massive data sets as “facilities” and agreed to occasionally certify that the government had reasonable procedures in place to minimize collection of “U.S. persons” data without a warrant.

Several companies contacted by The Post said they had no knowledge of the program and responded only to individual requests for information....
Onward and upward,
airforce