In Libertarian circles right now, there's quite a discussion about the government banning travel within the U.S., or forcibly moving people. I think it would probably be constitutional for the feds to do it. It would probably be MORE constitutional for the individual States to do it.

Judge Napolitano says that banning travel within the U.S.is unconstitutional. He's a judge I don't normally disagree with, but I think the Constitution DOES give Trump that power, under very limited conditions (such as an epidemic). This is based on case law that goes back about 150 years, so I have no clue how the Supreme Court would rule today.

No one has ever accused me of being a Trump fan, but I honestly can't fault him very much for his handling of this virus. That doesn't mean I'll vote for him. I'll either vote Libertarian, or for no one at all if I don't like the Libertarian candidate.

Onward and upward,
airforce